Guggenheim fellowship on race

Some DAs Make Effort to Help People Wrongfully Convicted of Crimes

Guggenheim fellowship on race, crime, and justice.

On a typical evening more than 30 years ago, Johnnie O’Neal was home watching television with his family. At the same time that night on March 16, 1984, a brutal crime was being committed in the Douglass Houses in Manhattan one that would change O’Neal’s life forever. The victim in that assault, a 21 year old woman, was robbed and raped at knifepoint.

In the aftermath, the woman, along with her mother, would later identify O’Neal as the assailant.Canada Goose online He was charged with rape and robbery, and later convicted and sentenced to 10 to 20 years in prison.

“I didn’t see any hope for me,” said O’Neal.

The arrest and the subsequent quest by O’Neal, who maintained his innocence, to prove that he didn’t commit the crimes are not uncommon. But an initiative used by some district attorneys and which eventually was crucial in the outcome of O’Neal’s case is gaining traction nationwide.

But O’Neal, who was repeatedly denied parole, served 13 years in prison for the rape and robbery. And in the years that followed, O’Neal continued to fight to prove his innocence, especially for his mother’s sake.

“You know she wore the stigma that her son was a rapist,” he said, “and that just killed me.”

Eight years after his release lawyers from the Legal Aid Society filed a motion to have O’Neal dropped from a Level 3 to a Level 1 sex offender. During that time the attorneys began reinvestigating his case, and reinterviewed the victim and her mother in 2008.

They recanted their story about where they saw O’Neal and when, and the lawyers’ investigation revealed other inconsistencies with the victim’s original story.

That cleared the way in 2010 for O’Neal to contact the Manhattan District Attorney’s Conviction Integrity Unit to request that his case be given a second look. The Manhattan DA conducted its own investigation and in 2013 filed a motion supporting O’Neal’s lawyers’ motion to dismiss the charges.

And after more than 28 years, O’Neal finally had his name cleared.

O’Neal’s current attorney, Jason Leventhal, says it may never have happened if the Manhattan District Attorney didn’t have a dedicated unit to review cases like this.

“The creation of a conviction integrity unit is a model that every prosecutor’s office should follow,” he said.

O’Neal’s case is just one example of the 1,600 exonerations that have occurred since 1989, according to the National Registry of Exonerations (NRE).

Several District Attorneys’ offices across the country have created Conviction Integrity Units (CIU) to investigate post conviction claims of innocence. In New York City, Manhattan and Brooklyn are the only districts to have launched units.

The men in charge of those offices happen to be two of the newer district attorneys. Manhattan DA Cyrus Vance has been in office for five years, and in Brooklyn, Ken Thompson has been in office for only a year and a half.

Vance created the first such unit in the city in 2010. He says one goal in creating the unit was to be more transparent about how his office deals with issues of conviction integrity.

“We need to make sure that we are doing the best we can to avoid making error judgments at the beginning of a case that may lead to a wrongful conviction,” Vance said. “And we need to have a process post conviction where people or lawyers believe their case should be reviewed.”

Manhattan’s unit is currently comprised of 10 senior members who are trained in the process of reviewing and re investigating cases. Vance has recently requested funding to add another attorney to the staff. So far the unit has reviewed more than 160 cases involving serious felonies such as homicides, rapes, burglaries, and robberies. They went on to re investigate 14 of those cases and O’Neal’s case is one of five that the office has consented to vacate.

Vance also has a separate advisory panel comprised of criminal justice experts such as former judges, former prosecutors, professors, and defense attorneys who advise the office on the best practices for reviewing cases.

“Outsiders are important because they can provide experience and input on what they think about the work we’re doing and how we can do it better,” he says.

In Kings County, former District Attorney Charles Hynes created the unit in 2011. Two years later, Hynes created a separate panel to review cases involving a former NYPD detective named Louis Scarcella after a review by the New York Times found the detective used the same witness in several cases.

Hynes said at the time that the investigations of a 1991 murder case Scarcella worked on “revealed allegations of improprieties on the part of the investigative detective, Louis Scarcella.”

After his election in 2014, Thompson expanded the office’s unit, which is now referred to as the Conviction Review Unit. It is comprised of 10 assistant district attorneys and three investigators, including former homicide prosecutor Mark Hale. Most of the units investigations are into cases that Scarcella worked on. During Thompson’s first year the unit successfully overturned 10 murder convictions for defendants who were wrongfully incarcerated due to Scarcella’s actions.

The Conviction Review Unit has taken on the task of investigating more than 70 convictions in which Scarcella was involved in the initial investigation. The cases focus mostly on human error, which can prove harder to investigate than cases involving DNA, Hale says.

“It is more of a challenge but it is more of an exacting examination then has been done anywhere in country by anybody,” he said. “We’re looking at everything, reexamination of witnesses, conduct of police officers, conduct of prosecutors even the performance of the defense attorney so that we can get a total picture not just one slice of it like the DNA cases are.”

Hale also admits there are some difficulties when investigating crimes that happened so far in the past and not relying on DNA evidence.

“Things are different now, prosecutions now are based in large part on DNA evidence, on social media on videotaped cameras that seem to be on every corner now that certainly weren’t there 10, 15 years ago going before that when prosecutions were basically built on confessions and eyewitness observations as opposed to scientific evidence and documentary evidence,” he said.

Brooklyn’s Conviction Review Unit is praised as one of the best in the country. Since 2014 it has investigated and vacated convictions for 13 individuals. Hale says a big part of the success was Thompson’s decision to have former Defense Attorney and Harvard Professor Ron Sullivan revamp the unit.