Next story: Malcolm Bonney's artwork at the Remington Rand Buidling
Art Scene
Work by Lin Price and Robert Booth at Buffalo Arts Studio
by Jack Foran
Go Figure
The current show at the Buffalo Arts Studio reprises a frequently asked question by art audiences: What does it all mean?
The show consists of paintings by Lin Price and small sculptural figures by Robert Booth. In both cases, devilishly perplexing as to just what the artist is trying to tell us. In some works, to the point you suspect the artist himself or herself isn’t quite sure.
What modern art—particularly abstract art—established was that it isn’t necessarily the artist’s job to tell us what he or she is thinking, what the art means. What it means is more what it means to us. The artist’s job is to make it meaningful.
But non-abstract art—figurative art—seems to pose the question again. What does the art mean? Because figurative is narrative, by and large. And narrative—a story—has to make sense. Or it’s something else, not narrative. (Not to impose anything on anybody. Not to straitjacket anything or anyone. But it’s a condition of story to make sense. Like a condition of painting is color, a condition of sculpture three dimensions. A condition and expectation that modern art plays on, challenges, sometimes undercuts, but can’t really annihilate. Because it’s a condition. The nature of the thing, you might say.)
Both artists offer notably figurative art that nonetheless bewilders. Such as Price’s painting Rare Bird, showing a man and a bird on a tree branch, the bird seemingly part hawk, part parrot, maybe part something else, the man with his eyes closed as if in meditation or reverie, and cradling in his hands, against his chest, a very large bone, like a small dinosaur bone.
Or one called Natural Disaster, showing the same man as in the Rare Bird and many other paintings—the artist’s husband, apparently—standing fully clad in street clothes in a pool of water just about to cover his shoes, the water emanating from a standpipe and spigot that looks like it could be shut off as easily as not, but is not.
Other works make a little more sense, like Push and Pull (for Hans), divided top and bottom into two distinct segments, the top segment showing the man again pulling—or attempting to—a vacation house trailer, the kind meant to be pulled behind a car or small truck, with a huge rope or chain, the bottom segment several dung beetles pushing huge—three times their size—balls of manure.
There’s a connection, but just a connection. Partly the deal is like that with abstract art. The audience has to complete the work. But what’s the story? The real connection? Okay. Push and pull. But so what?
Most of the works seem deliberately—even a little perversely—to frustrate rather than suggest a comprehensible narrative.
Robert Booth’s little human figure statues fall into three basic categories, the artist explained briefly at the opening.
First, the ordinary and everyday, of people often in slightly awkward moments and poses, such as when just getting out of the shower, half wrapped in a towel, half naked.
Second category, war, or more precisely, it seemed, the aftermath of war, such as a statue of a man balancing on one leg and bandaged foot, the other leg and both arms bandaged stumps. Entitled Raymond: a Good Dancer before the War.
The third category he did not seem to explain so clearly. (Or I missed it. But I was listening.) Of figures in situations or with attributes unusual to the point of bizarre. Such as several what you might call pincushion or porcupine statues (or St. Stephen comes to mind) stuck all around the upper body, neck to belly, with a few dozen needle-like wooden sticks. Maybe something about acupuncture. Extreme acupuncture. Or one showing a woman emerging, a bed pillow in each hand, from a carpentered opening in the top of what looks like a birdhouse. What?
You’re on your own.
The Lin Price and Robert Booth exhibit continues through July 30.
—jack foran
Reader Comments (posting new comments is closed!)
|
Seth 07 Jul 2011, 12:36
Although Lin Price's paintings bring up interesting, challenging, and mysterious questions, this review brings up quite a few of its own. Have you ever enjoyed a surrealist painting? Have you ever been captivated by an oddly cryptic narrative painting by Balthus, or de Chirico? Or Amy Cutler, Robin O'Neil, Mark Greenwold, or David Salle, or.. (oh, the list is too long.) Have you ever been moved by a master filmmaker such as Tarkovsky, or more recently Terrance Malick? Have you ever been moved by almost any modern poet, or read a few pages of James Joyce? Or seen a play by Beckett? Maybe all this "modern" narrative stuff is too difficult, but have you ever stood in front of a Justice Painting by a renaissance master like Dirk Bouts or Gerard David, in which complex narratives are told in four part vignettes on two panels each? These amazing Justice panels are fascinating, even though most people are untrained enough to recognize and understand the narratives that would have been familiar to 14th c., illiterate people. Sometimes, when dining "on your own" at a very nice restaurant, the delicious meal is even more enjoyable when you pick up the spoon and feed yourself.
Ben Altman 07 Jul 2011, 12:37
Full disclosure: Lin Price is a friend. However... I think it's reasonable to expect that an art critic likes art and has made a study of it. If Mr Foran is such a critic, his review is dishonest - cynically playing an old, old tune to what he assumes is an audience with conservative tastes, while knowing full well that his comments are absurd. If he does not understand these matters and his article is a straightforward account of his experience of the show, he should educate himself better before writing art criticism. Mr. Foran asks for a story. I suggest he should read a novel, and one that is not too sophisticated. If Ms. Price wanted to tell a story, she would exhibit text. Her work deals in images. They are her way to represent ideas, emotions, situations, and non-linear connections. An example - has Mr. Foran tried to narrate a dream recently? If he were to do so, he would find that the images from the dream are often more compelling than the narration. When Mr Foran looks at Picasso's Les Demoiselles d'Avignon, one of the more influential paintings of the modern age and now over 100 years old, does he demand narrative? There may be "stories" in the work, but I doubt any two viewers would read them the same. So the questions anyone should ask (Mr. Foran included) when standing in front of a painting - whether it is by Picasso or Lin Price - are: Do I respond to these images? What are the connections between the images in the painting and in the show? What emotions or experiences might the artist be responding to or wanting to evoke in me? (And those could indeed be mystification, confusion, or frustration, although in Lin's case I doubt it.) So please, Mr. Foran, your readers - and the artists - deserve something better. Even if you don't like the work, at least give us a thoughtful account of why. Ben Altman
joy adams 07 Jul 2011, 12:52
Jack Foran seems to be irritated by not having everything spelled out for him in his review of Lin Price and Robert Booth at The Buffalo Art Studio. I saw Price's work and enjoyed the journey without the need of a literal translation, as 4th graders might want. One has to look a bit deeper than what might lie on the surface of a painting. I did not feel the need to have Ms Price standing by each painting to tell me what they were all about, I just made up my own interpretation, and it wasn't hard. This is "Everyman" and the difficulties of his daily mundane existence, his dreams below the surface, and his hidden eccentricities. This is something Mr Foran and millions like him should be able to identify with. Alternatively, I just enjoyed the work as it is, a collection of idiosyncratic paintings executed with empathy and a sense of humor,sometimes using intense color for areas of respite, or as a nod to the color field artists. Wanna give me a job as an art critic? Joy Adams (painter)
Gary Price 08 Jul 2011, 15:07
In the interests of full disclosure, I am the husband who is fully clad. But I want to talk about Robert Booth, first. Lin & I have no connection to Bob, never met him before the opening, and neither of us have a lot of knowledge about sculpture, well, at least I don't. When we were coming home from it all I mentioned to Lin that I felt her work came from a sense of curiosity, or as Jack Foran said, "perplexity," and I thought Robert Booth's work came from a sense of angst. As a businessman I always feel obligated to sum things up. Of course, it's never as simple as that. I thought Robert Booth's ability to render the human form was exquisite. He reminded me of my physical therapist massaging my foot (Oh God, Gary, stop now), she seems to feel & know where every bone & ligament is. I think Bob does, too. And he can render them perfectly. But there's the other feeling. Empathy with man, and woman. Physical conditions that limit hope, stigmas of perceptions of a gender's place, a person's place, the stick pins before we had sticky notes, reminding someone to "Do this, Do that." The stick pins that come with the territory. I think Bob is on that pulse and it bothers him. Therefore, art. When I first met Lin she was a cashier at a Kroger's Supermarket in Ann Arbor, Michigan. When I went over to her apartment she showed me a watercolor of a young woman pointing sideways at a duck for no good reason. I knew I was on to something. Over the years she's poured over George Innes and Philip Guston, and apparently me, as she walked up hill both ways and progressed to teaching painting at Ithaca College. She's a star in my book. What she's painting about is not my problem. She solves all issues of my understanding by politely telling me, "That's ok, just stand there." The fact that I'm still in her paintings after 36 years is a good sign. After all, Vermeer painted realtives, and cooks, and staff, so did Picasso, and Sonia Delaunay, although she used blocks of color for them. Sometimes I think I get it. Usually I'm just in awe of Lin's zone, when she's in it. Maybe Jack Foran did a good job. He's basically left it all up to your own imagination. He could have said the shows were "just fine," and that would have killed it. Buffalo, rise up! What a treasure you have in the Buffalo Arts Studio, Cori Wolff, the Curator, and Joanna Angie, the Director, and the 30 artists with no doors who work in this hive. Go to their shows. Go to their 20th Anniversary Show in September. And go see Lin Price & Robert Booth before their shows close on July 30, and you have to pay at the door to see them at the Met. Hey, you never know!
jack foran 12 Jul 2011, 17:34
After reading this small barrage of comments, I agree with most of them. I don’t agree with the “cynical” characterization. Maybe a better descriptive would be “dense,” or maybe “obtuse.” The surrealist idea, dream imagery idea, seems right on, and I should have gone more in that direction. But there were sufficient narrative elements in the works of both artists to suggest interesting stories, but insufficient to tell the story. One wants to know an interesting story, if someone brings one up. (Or it’s as if these were private stories, but partially told. Which seems somewhat problematic.) And I went off on a narrative tangent. I felt and still feel there are narrative issues here. If I seemed irritated, I did not mean to. On the other hand, I think art has a function to be irritating, to the end of challenging our complacencies, causing us to rethink what we think we know. This art experience did that for me. Jack Foran |
|
Issue Navigation> Issue Index > v10n27 (Week of Thursday, July 7) > Art Scene > Work by Lin Price and Robert Booth at Buffalo Arts Studio This Week's Issue • Artvoice Daily • Artvoice TV • Events Calendar • Classifieds |







