Artvoice: Buffalo's #1 Newsweekly
Home Blogs Web Features Calendar Listings Artvoice TV Classifieds Contact
Previous story: Scorecard: The Week's Winners and Losers
Next story: Aspects of Affect

The Republican Romance With Debt and Unemployment

Republican Speaker of the House, John Boehner

Let’s face an ugly reality—Republicans love unemployment. Some, like GOP presidential candidate Michelle Bachmann, are even honest enough to admit it. The calculus is very simple. It’s tough for presidents to get re-elected when unemployment is high or trending upward. If your game plan is to grab power at any cost, even destroying a nation to do it, then unemployment is good. Voting against any program that realistically addresses unemployment is also good. So is laying off hundreds of thousands of government workers. This is how the Republican Congress helped slam the brakes on the so called economic recovery.

This game plan isn’t new. Study at the history of Weimar Germany during the economic depression of the early 1930s. Nazi representatives in the Reichstag (parliament) opposed measures to address hyperinflation and other economic woes, allowing the country to drift further into economic chaos, paving the way for “change.”

A skyrocketing national debt is also good for the GOP. That’s because voters hold social entitlements like Medicare and Social Security sacred. And they like their parks, highways, schools, hospitals, fire departments and other services that we created governments to provide. They’ll whine about taxes, but they’ll whine even louder when politicians threaten to cut such services. And if they can remember long enough, they’ll punish them at the polls. The new breed of Republicans, however, hate these very things, instead holding tax cuts on top of tax cuts on top of tax cuts for the rich, as sacred.

It’s politically untenable, however, to sell their agenda for what it is—raising college tuition, firing cops and teachers, letting roads and bridges rot, all to offset tax breaks for luxury yachts, second homes and billion dollar inheritances. This is where the debt comes in. You can erase the debt by rolling back a few of the many tax cuts Washington has bestowed upon the rich over the last few decades. But that would mean congress voting to raise taxes on themselves, since most members of congress, no surprise here, have beaucoup bucks. Then there’s the national media—another pack of rich bastards. So taxing the rich is off the table. We’ll continue to watch them motor by on their new floating mansions and trophy cars, even as more and more American families sink into despair.

With raising revenue by taxing the rich so far off the table that we won’t even talk about it, the only option left when it comes to debt is to cut expenditures. Of course campaign contributions by the defense, energy and financial sectors have put cutting funding for wars and corporate welfare also off the table. This leaves cutting what I’ll call, the “good stuff” and the “necessary stuff”—essentially cutting the very reason we tolerate government. The radical right, which we can now gloss simply as “Republicans,” has always had this stuff in their crosshairs. Cutting the deficit gives them the rationale to do what is otherwise untenable, and cut the good and necessary stuff.

And don’t be surprised that they are willing to hold the very health of the American economy hostage, threatening to let the country crash and default if they don’t get their way. Their policies, if enacted, will destroy the country anyway, exasperating social inequality, already at a historic high, to the point of societal collapse (And this doesn’t even take into account their environmental agenda, which appears rapture-dependent). So why wouldn’t they let the country default? Chaos is strategically beneficial to their goals.

So let’s look at this doomsday cult that now controls the US Congress. It turns out that many of the loudest deficit hawks are the very same politicians who voted for the George W. Bush era policies, tax cuts and wars that turned the budget surplus left by the fiscally conservative Clinton White House, into a historically unprecedented federal deficit. They took over the country when it was flush with cash and went wild, taking the US economy out for a drunken joyride. Start permanent wars, grow the military industrial complex, all while cutting taxes for the rich and running the treasury on a big fat credit card. These self proclaimed fiscal conservatives went into uncharted territory, driving the economy right off a cliff. Now they want us to pay their debts and do their jail time, all while giving them every Christmas gift they ever desired. This is the real definition of “entitlement mentality.” Know these bastards for what they are.

Dr. Michael I. Niman is a professor of journalism and media studies at Buffalo State College. His previous columns are at www.artvoice.com, archived at www.mediastudy.com, and available globally through syndication.


Reader Comments (posting new comments is closed!)

Ohio boy
14 Jul 2011, 06:14
Here we go again.

So now we're saying that Republicans, which would have to mean the people who voted in the previous election to change the balance of power, are all for unemployment. This is too broad a statement. Can't we just blame everything on global warming and sunspot activity again?

Uncle Bluck
14 Jul 2011, 08:36
Ohio Boy...I have been a registered Republican for over 30 years, although i vote as an independent. All anyone has to do is watch or read the news on a daily basis to see that everything the author of this article said about the congressional Republicans is true.....

donald
14 Jul 2011, 12:30
in addition to owning the means of production, the few don't want to maintain them. schools, roads, safety nets etc..they want us to maintain their equipment while the few enjoy the fruits. when you are playing poker and one person has all the chips- game over folks. beware-they are resisting the new game. if all these "job creators" are not going to create new jobs because of the taxes. tax it where it sits.

Jim
14 Jul 2011, 15:51
Sorry Mikey, you're a 'journalism' professor, and a poor one at that, not an economist. This article is partisan idiocy. Any semblance of a chance at credibility was destroyed by your childish broadbrush Nazi smear. Pitiful.

Tony
14 Jul 2011, 16:50
Jim! As a fellow economist with postgraduate qualifications (I'm assuming here from your superior tone that you at least have the qualifications to make your remark). I think you will find a number of full-blooded economists (some with Nobel prizes for their craft) in agreement with Dr. Niman. For my part I would say that, if anything, Dr. Niman is being rather generous to the ruling classes in the United States and in many other nations who have had to try to sell the concept of "save the banks from their own ills" at the cost of social services. In other words Jim may I suggest you go back to your cave?

Tony Phillips

Ha
15 Jul 2011, 09:17
Dr. Give me a break.

I_cant_believe_they_published_this_crap
15 Jul 2011, 11:50
If more people are dependent on government, doesnt that help the "big government" party?

Dependence is one strategy for staying in power, and the party of handouts is doing a fine job of making people dependent on them.

Government workers, higher taxes, and a plethora of programs all HURT the economy. Your understanding of economics is weak at best.

What program realistically addresses unemployment? They all subsidize unemployment, and when you subsidize something, you get more of it.

Mark Winsick
16 Jul 2011, 01:12
Anyone who can't see the Republican agenda as cutting services to the citizenry as a whole is blind. Look at Wisconsin, Minnesota and Ohio. The Bush administration drove this country into debt for NO GOOD REASON and now we're supposed to sacrifice to get the country out of the hole. When do the rich sacrifice? NEVER! Where are all the jobs the corporate tax cuts and tax cuts for the rich were supposed to create? THEY DIDN"T create any jobs. Why should people get rich off this country and not pay their share? I pay mine. They are greedy pigs and don't give a shit whether or not you have a decent wage, healthcare, clean air, a decent school, whatever. They can buy what they want and screw you and me. Who screwed up the WORLD economy with the housing crisis which was really another screw job on the non rich? The rich. The greedy banks and wall street pigs. Now the republicans want to continue to sanction the rich to get richer while you can go @#$% yourself. It's completely appalling and disgusting. Niman is right. Most of congress is rich. Who do the serve the most? The rich. You think the rich care about you or this country? Well, wake up. They only care to the extent that they can get richer.

Ohio boy
16 Jul 2011, 08:08
I can only imagine a glimpse into a class at Buffalo State media studies 101. Must go like this:

1.Flick cigarette somewhere, saunter in, await enlightened professor's entrance, and begin class.
2. Open discussion about current events but quickly turn to politics and place nasty blame on the right and rich people (only Republican rich people, there are allegedly no rich people on the left except maybe the guy who heads Apple)
3. Get em all stirred up, that's a good thing, lets all those hurt feelings out
4. Praise Nobel laureates, top economists, people with any post graduate degrees who've got your back
5. Assignment - Create angry essay on a political issue, stress political correctness, and blame all problems on Republicans using half truths and same old talking points i.e. rich don't pay taxes, all corporation heads are Republican (except what's his name from Apple), the wealthy don't want to make money or create jobs when they can just steal it from the poor, the all live in the "South, suburbia, and flyover country, etc.

I could have written this when I was in college in 1970 but instead of Republicans the dirty word of the day was the "establishment". Reminds me of that sign "the beatings will continue until morale improves". Yuk.


Jay
18 Jul 2011, 09:43
Mike- you hit another home run with this article. My only critique is that you use the word "entitlements" as if that were truly the right way to describe critical social and economic programs that people have paid for, fought for, died for. The word "entitlements" suggests "something for nothing". the constant use of this word is an ideologues disinformation strategy which has entered into the main stream and has been used to propagate the big lie. The president uses it and just about every media pundit uses it. thats a real shame. You know where this word came from. Words and nuances mean a lot. Lets fight the use of this word and put it in its proper place. For instance, and I know that you have used this language mike, Most corporate tax breaks and loopholes are the real "entitlements." Corporate welfare has benefited a few and hurt many. Lets take back the language.

Speaking of tax breaks and loopholes, why do even so called "progressive" pundits and leaders, and the President, use language such as "tax cuts for the rich" when the nuanced language should shift toward "closing loopholes", and making the rich pay their fair share."

Turin Turambar
22 Jul 2011, 15:09
Hey, I'm really down with this idea...

"Let's take back the language!"


You've got that part of it right. Let's beat up all of those freaky little weaklings and misfits among us who try to handicap both sides, through vapid psychology, by blunting language and concepts ...in the course of playing all of us. This insistence on diversionary, flabby psychology in place of direct, square language and confrontation should be met with the iron muscle, blackshirt tactics of Mussolini by kicking their fucking asses.

Hahaha! That would give us back the language!


So true, it's revolutionary: The day that we haul all of the intellectual leaders and other important assholes of the liberal establishment - especially, the Dr. Phils - up onto platforms of public stockades, for anyone to beat the shit out of ...from sun-up unto sun-down... will be the day that society will finally be free to go to work on real solutions - free of the meaningless semantical distractions that protect the real criminals ...matriarchal witches, and their sick little familiars. Bravo, Dude!


Amen and amen: When, finally, we return to the primary concept that "A = A", we will also benefit from a return to "an eye for an eye", too. Then, not only will public looters (like - oh, say - teachers and the rest of the public unions) go to jail for their fiscal thuggery, but, murdering abortionists will swing high from public gallows' along with the gangsters (who no one is allowed to associate with any label - thanks to semantics), as well. Yes, indeed. Language can once again concur with itself. Many things, in fact, can be set right. Useless eaters can be sent straight to the hell that they deserve!


Love it! Brilliant! :D