Artvoice: Buffalo's #1 Newsweekly
Home Blogs Web Features Calendar Listings Artvoice TV Classifieds Contact
Previous story: Deaf Ears in the Chambers
Next story: Buffalo Philharmonic Chorus Hits Sour Note

Amherst IDA Strikes Again

The Town of Amherst Industrial Development Agency received a well-earned round of criticism last August when it decided to award the Prime Wines Group $500,000 to relocate their outrageously successful Premier Liquor and Wines outlet from their longtime home on Delaware Avenue in Tonawanda. The idea that one town could essentially bribe a lucrative business with tax credits to remove itself from the neighboring town’s tax lists and set up shop on one the busiest commercial strips in the Buffalo suburbs became a glitzy and appalling example of an IDA system run amok. At the time, the lone dissenter on the Amherst IDA board, Robert Ciesielski, told the Buffalo News, “I think this is probably the worst use of IDA incentives that I’ve seen in a while.”

But it’s becoming a well-established pattern for the AIDA. In May 2010 it gave a tax break of $536,000 to one of the areas largest car dealers, Northtown Automotive, to build an expanded “state of the art” Lexus dealership. Part of the rationale then was that the project would resurrect an abandoned Chrysler dealership, removing an eyesore from the landscape.

Most recently, the AIDA decided to award Ellicott Development, a well-known metonymy for Carl Paladino, a $1.9 million tax break to build a 219,640-square-foot, six-story, mixed-use project on the Stereo Advantage site at Main and Union in Williamsville. The AIDA “agency summary” dated January 20, 2012 describes “a 120-room select-service hotel, 40 market rate apartments, 4,300 square feet of retail space, a 3,000 square foot restaurant and 234 on-site parking spaces.”

And here’s their rationale on why an extremely successful developer like Paladino should receive tax credits to build a project that caters to an exclusive set of consumers: “AIDA assistance is necessary to mitigate the additional cost and risks associated with redeveloping the site. The project is located in an urban area with a substantially higher acquisition cost. The purchase price of $3.6 million is nearly six times more than the typical cost of a hotel site the developer considers purchasing. A significant portion of the purchase price is related to the existing building which cannot be used and must be demolished at an estimated cost of $100,000.”

Does the AIDA really expect the public to believe that tax breaks are “necessary” due to the financial risk involved on the part of a developer who pledged to spend as much as $10 million of his own money on a failed gubernatorial campaign—a campaign, it must be pointed out, that sharply criticized government wasteful spending?

The real kicker, though, is that a sizable chunk of the tax credit comes out of county-wide tax revenues. In the Paladino project, for example, out of the $1.9 million tax break, $156,695 comes out of county property taxes and a whopping $844,092 comes from a sales tax break. Money that, in other words, is meant to be deposited directly into a public bank shared by every resident of Erie County.

Reached by phone last week, Assemblyman Sean Ryan said that he is proposing a change to the legislation to grant approval rights to every municipality affected by such an IDA grant, thus reducing the likelihood one IDA poaching a successful business from a neighboring town, as happened with Premier. Ryan also seeks to reactivate the nomenclature: What’s an industrial development agency without industry?

“I don’t think the [Paladino hotel project] is a good investment,” Ryan said. “[The IDA] is desgined to create and maintain high-paying jobs, industrial jobs, hence the name. We’ve gotten so far afield from that. We need real economic development, not just economic activity. I think that economic activity is far too often confused for economic development.” As a counterexample to Premier and the Paladino project, Ryan pointed to IDA breaks given to Curtis Screw, a Buffalo manufacturer that used the grants to help grow the business and add new, well-paying jobs with benefits.

While the hotel project in Amherst is sure to generate its share of tax revenue for both the Town of Amherst and Erie County, economic activity cannot substitute for development. If people merely take their business to the newer, flashier location and leave their old business to rot, what’s the net public benefit? What’s next in Amherst? The old Circuit City receives IDA funds to be converted into a Bass Pro?


Reader Comments (posting new comments is closed!)

Terrence Bucker
02 Feb 2012, 07:33
Right on!

Damian Weber
02 Feb 2012, 11:25
"Does the AIDA really expect the public to believe that tax breaks are “necessary” due to the financial risk involved on the part of a developer who pledged to spend as much as $10 million of his own money on a failed gubernatorial campaign—a campaign, it must be pointed out, that sharply criticized government wasteful spending?"

James J. Allen
02 Feb 2012, 13:05
While the tax incentives did total approximately $1.9 million, the project will pay during the abatement period an estimated $2.7 million, or approximately $270,000 per year. The parcel that the project is being built on currently pays $40,000 per year in taxes. Even with tax abatement, the parcel will pay nearly 7 times the amount of taxes currently being generated on the site. Therefore, there is no tax loss to the town, the county or the school district but rather a substantial increase in revenue gained.
Additionally, the project will create 50 new jobs with an annual payroll of approximately $1,250,000 and it is estimated that those employees will generate an additional $18,000 in new sales tax and $22,000 in new property tax. The project will also generate 235 jobs from new construction and construction services, with a value of $14 million. The new operation will also have an estimated $3.8 million impact on the community in terms of sales in restaurants, stores, entertainment, transportation and service providers.
This is an example of redevelopment as opposed to continual sprawl. It is an example of smart growth and should be celebrated, not denigrated.

Aaron Lowinger
02 Feb 2012, 13:41
@ James J. Allen - I'm well aware of the economic activity that this project will generate, but the problem is that this project would have been built without any taxpayer money going into it at all.

Couple this with the strong possibility that this project won't cause economic development, only draw economic activity away from other area businesses, and the idea that public money is involved makes my stomach turn.

Using your logic, Mr. Allen, just about any business with a proven track record (read big time developer, chain store, or both) opening in Amherst would be able to justify receiving taxpayer money, and that's not what the IDAs are for.


James J. Allen
02 Feb 2012, 14:57
@Aaron Lowinger. You are entitled to that opinion, but you are wrong! Redevelopment will not occur spontaneously. If it would, why hasn't it? Why are there contaminated sites not being developed? Why are there thousands of vacant properties not being developed throughout the region? How much more vacancy would you like to see before you accept the fact that incentives are necessary to encourage redevelopment.
Smart growth, and that entails redeveloping existing sites and buildings rather than developing greenfield sites, won't just happen. We need to streamline the permitting process, change zoning codes and offer incentives to offset the additional costs of remediation and demolition if we want denser, more compact, development.

Aaron Lowinger
02 Feb 2012, 15:04
There's no way I'm wrong about this:

Main Street in Williamsville is NOT an example of vacancy and environmental contamination.

If Paladino's project was, say, at Genesee and Fillmore. I would reconsider my opinion.

James J. Allen
02 Feb 2012, 15:55
For the record I absolutely agree that incentives should be offered to developers to redevelop Genesee and Fillmore and other sites within the City. But your comment makes my point...redevelopment does not happen spontaneously.
Our region needs a redevelopment strategy that includes expedited permitting, form based codes, tax incentives/credits and other such tools.
In re to Main Street, Williamsville- should the town of Amherst wait until there is blight and decay before doing something about sites that are vacant or buildings that are obsolete and barely functional. Or should we be pro-active in developing a plan and implementation strategy to prevent that from occuring? Waiting for decay to occur before you do something about it makes no sense to me.
I am hopeful that the new County administration will develop an aggressive approach to redevelopment throughout the County. But as I stated previously, the first ring suburbs are part of the urban core. And preventing blight and decay where it hasn't already occurred needs to be a part of that strategy.
I would hope that you could at least agree with me on that!

Aaron Lowinger
03 Feb 2012, 11:20
James, I can't agree with you that Main Street in Williamsville has ever been in danger of blight and decay.

Lumping the vacancy and housing problems found in first-ring suburbs like Tonawanda, Lackawanna, Cheektowaga with Williamsville is inappropriate.


User
04 Feb 2012, 00:51
Main Street in Williamsvile is a parking lot.

User
04 Feb 2012, 18:01
It's only socialism when it's for somebody else.

mark
06 Feb 2012, 12:05
burp, this makes me sick. since the building will cost $100,000 to demolish, essentially they are agreeing to give paldino $3.6 million to do it for them

Pete Calthorp
08 Feb 2012, 18:21
Mr Allen,
As an administrator and educator, please objectively consider these edits to your statement:

Our IDA's need to respond to a comprehensive redevelopment strategy that includes expedited permitting, form based codes, tax incentives/credits and other such tools that do not allow one area to usurp business development from another, nor to equate retail with industrial development. Fairness to all developers and equal consideration of projects will take place based on quality of project, need in the community, job wage and value and principled application of urban design. No projects will be incentivized that are contrary to the interests of the taxpayer.