Artvoice: Buffalo's #1 Newsweekly
Home
AV Daily
Events Calendar
Back Issues
View Classifieds
Place Classified
Best of Buffalo 2008
Still Life Gallery
Video Production
Exile on Allen St.
Contact Us
Advertise

Flawless

Jules Dassin, the blacklisted leftist American filmmaker who passed away overseas recently, directed what has long been widely regarded as the archetypal heist movie, Rififi, in Paris in 1955. It’s got one of the truly bravura displays of technique in popular-film history: The more-than-20-minute long, dialogue-free portrayal of the robbery of a French jewelry store. This extended sequence has often been described as an example of “pure cinema,” and while purity and cinema seem unlikely bedfellows to me, there’s no gainsaying Dassin’s pulsing, tensely economical achievement in it.

Michael Radford’s Flawless is certainly a heist movie, but he and his collaborators also have at least a couple of other things on their minds. There’s nothing “pure” about their movie.



Watch the trailer for "Flawless"

Demi Moore in Flawless
Demi Moore is Laura Quinn, a 38-year-old expat executive at a London, England diamond wholesaler, a giant in the industry. When she’s passed over for elevation to a managing directorship for the sixth time, apparently because she’s a woman, and she learns she’s facing what the English call redundancy, she falls in league with a strangely shrewd, personally mysterious building custodian (Michael Caine), agreeing to be part of his diamond robbery scheme. And as the scheme advances, she realizes she’s part of something bigger and more dangerous too.

Obviously enough, the filmmakers meant to enrich their effort with more than suspenseful plot turns and mechanics. That is, they’ve provided two or three philosophical gestures, as well. Their movie is framed by an unconvincing flashback from the present in an attempt to emphasize its feminist slant, for example.

But writer Edward A. Anderson seems to have had difficulty welding the ideas onto a crime melodrama, and Radford’s direction is more efficient than involving.

Moore and Caine aren’t given quite enough opportunity to develop a chemistry. He showed up with his reliably smooth and clever performance game, but sometimes the movie falters when he’s not around.

Flawless has its tense moments, and it evidences an admirable seriousness, but you may find yourself wishing it was a little more tautly reminiscent of Dassin’s old film.


Current Movie TimesFilm Now PlayingArtvoice Film Reviews


Reader Comments


No comments yet!

Leave a Comment:













Artvoice Events Calendar
Sorry, this content requires Flash 9

Go to today

Calendar:

Find:


Regular Artvoice Features:

Cover Stories
Columns
Film Reviews & Movie Trailers
Music Reviews
Wining and Dining
The Arts
Book Reviews

Recent Artvoice Blog headlines:

AV DAILY (by Artvoice Editorial):
FOILed Again: (Partial) Satisfaction
Common Council Action Plan
The Raucous Caucus: Politics Vs. Substance
Williams Interviewed for Memphis Job
Letters From Paladino
Taking the “Public” Out of Public Hearing

AV MUSIC (by Donny Kutzbach):
Have a brew and party like it’s 1994!
Friday night is killing me
You’re Missing - Danny Federici: 1950-2008
Yer my guitar hero

Recent reader comments:

Jamie wrote: Helen, I don't know why you say Phil Rumore "chose to ignore" any...
Susan Wolf wrote: I can not wait till the crop comes to fruition..I have a garden o...
Helen of Troy wrote: Buffalo and Phil Rumore get what they deserve. These stories abo...
peter koch wrote: For the record, Bruce Fisher is not a staffer at AV. He is a free...
Bflodiddy wrote: To read what's really happening in Buffalo Schools check this out...
Search Artvoice.com:

Save it & Share it:

Print page Print page
Email page Email page
Tag with del.icio.us Tag with del.icio.us
Digg it Digg it
Seed Newsvine Seed Newsvine
Submit to reddit Submit to reddit
Subscribe to feed Subscribe to feed
Permalink Permalink













<http://artvoice.com/issues/v7n16/film_reviews/flawless> © 1990-2008 Artvoice. All rights reserved.