Artvoice: Buffalo's #1 Newsweekly
Home Blogs Web Features Events Weekly Features Classifieds Contact

News

Outspoken for Equality

Activists head to Albany to fight for same-sex marriage legislation

Kitty Lambert is one of the most enthusiastic people you will ever meet. Lambert and her partner of 14 years, Cheryle Rudd, are both grandmothers who lead the group Outspoken for Equality. This Tuesday, April 29, they are going to Albany to meet with state leaders about the issue of gay marriage.

Outspoken for Equality is working on the passage of the Marriage Equality Bill in New York, not only to recognize same-sex marriages from other jurisdictions but also to allow same-sex couples to marry in the state and provide them with the same rights and privileges afforded heterosexual couples. The group emphasizes that marriage is a civil right and that governments, not religious institutions, issue marriage licenses. With marriage comes 1,324 New York State rights, benefits, and protections that are denied to LGBT families.

Currently, New York State recognizes same-sex marriages from other jurisdictions. If you’re a gay couple and you marry in parts of Canada, Spain, Vermont, or Massachusetts, New York will recognize that union. This carries over into insurance and health benefits, although those benefits are taxed as income because such unions are not recognized at the federal level.

Michael James, chair of the Stonewall Democrats of Western New York, says, “We used to be attacked for being promiscuous and not being family-oriented. Now that we want the right to marry, we’re being attacked for ruining family values. I’ve been in a monogamous relationship for 31 years. My sister is on her fourth marriage.”

The group has worked with several politicians open to gay marriage. They praise Governor David Paterson for having a nonconfrontational style, and they believe the political climate is promising for equality. They also applaud politicians such as Sam Hoyt, Antoine Thompson, Byron Brown, and Mark Schroeder. Schroeder, they point out, initially signed onto DOMA (the Defense of Marriage Act), ostensibly for religious reasons. The group met with Schroeder and talked to him about the history of marriage in New York State. On the books, marriage by law has always been intended to protect assets, inheritance rights, and estates, and has had nothing to do with religious affiliation.

Schroeder researched the topic and came to the conclusion that the wording of marriage as a contractual bond involving property rights indeed had nothing to do with religion and has now come to support gay marriage.

“Every senator not on board will be a focus of our efforts. We want to educate not alienate them, ” says Bruce Kogan, retired from the New York State Crime Victims Board.

Politicians the group is focusing on are bipartisan. State senators such as Mary Lou Rath, Dale Volker, and George Maziarz are Republicans. However, Democrats such as Bill Stachowski have also signed onto DOMA.

Many politicians cite religion or their constituency as factors in not supporting gay rights.

When Lambert asked Maziarz why he was against gay marriage, he said, “I’m a devout Catholic,” to which Lambert retorted, “Your constituents didn’t elect you to be a good Catholic.”

“Churches have even helped us with our letter writing campaigns,” says Lambert. Pilgrim St. Luke’s, Temple Beth Zion, and Unity Church are just a few that have shown support.

“I’m a citizen of the United States, I pay my taxes, raise my children, volunteer to my community, I want to protect my family. We’re frustrated that our children are dismissed as not being in a family. We hope more folks will realize allowing gays to marry will add to the economic stability of the state,” says Lambert.

Equality and Justice Day is Tuesday, April 29. If you’d like more information or would like to join the lobby on Albany contact: OUTspokenformarriage.org/578-3782.

lucy yau


Reader Comments


Jesus Christ
24 Apr 2008, 00:48
"Christians" should know and undrstand that happy, healthy gay people don't give a damn about what they think. Also, alot of people think "Christians" are dumb. Since when do we need to ask for permission from a "Christian" whom we can marry? They can go to hell!

Robert Coffman
24 Apr 2008, 20:55
Keep quoting Bruce Kogan !!!

William
25 Apr 2008, 05:27
Up until recent times I considered myself as a Christian. Now I dare not associate myself with that title when I see how so-called Christians are nothing more than a bunch of bigoted and prejudiced morons whom are holier than thou. "Treat your neighbor as you would have them treat you"... well if that's the Christian way it's apparent all these Godly Christians who condemn same sex couples the rights of equality and happiness are really NON Christians. They are not following the examples of Jesus, so who they hell are they to preach Christian ways when all they are doing is inflicting great harm on thousands of God's children? Look in your own closets and see how clean they are of adultery, infidelity, hypocrisy and all the stains of sin you accuse homosexuals of! Jesus Christ said: "Let he who is without sin be the first to cast a stone"... Are you all without sin?

Jonathan
25 Apr 2008, 09:53
This is awesome. It's incredible that a dedicated group of people can help an elected official change their position on such an important issue.

Peter A Reese
26 Apr 2008, 21:29
Honest question: Why not call this desired legally recognized relationship a "domestic partnership", and create a legal status which deals with all important issues like "assets, inheritance rights, and estates", health care, proxy privileges, taxation, etc? Allow any two persons to enter into such a relationship without regard to sexual preference, consanguinity or other factors. Could be brother and sister, mother and son, two unrelated males/females, etc. Now you have removed religious considerations and you don’t need to battle the Christian right, left or middle. If you get everything you would from a “marriage”, who cares what it’s called?

I think it is a serious strategic mistake to seek a “marriage”. That is sure to frighten old, white, middle class people like me. I know the distinction is stupid, but why do this the hard way? I think you could convert a battle into a sleigh ride with a change of terminology.

Aussie
27 Apr 2008, 00:44
Evil can only be done when good people stay silent. Thank you Bruce for your courage in seeking to speak up and give a voice to those who are too afraid to. GBLT people are entitled to "certain inalienable rights" too. One step at a time, sure. But the steps MUST be taken!

Amy
05 May 2008, 13:05
To Peter A Reese. The reason we don't seek a "Domestic partnership" is because In order to gain access to the 1,324 laws that come from a marriage the law makers would have to alter each and every law to say "domestic partnership" instead of marriage. Now most of the lgbt community could care less what you call our unions so long as we have equal rights, but law makers don't want to change all of those laws. It would take years to change all of them and who knows what battles we would then face when challenging 1,324 laws. Nothing will ever truly be equal until we are granted permission to marry our partners in our churches and have the same benefits as any other free American.

Leave a Comment:












Artvoice Events Calendar:

Go to today

Calendar:

Find:

Movie Times
Venue Directory
Artviews Gallery Directory

Recent Artvoice Blog headlines:

Artvoice Daily (by Artvoice Editorial):
…And in Other Gardening News
Weeding the Backyard
What He Said
Carl Paladino: Let's Change State Constitution
CPO Club Update
Terence S. Underwood, A Vanishing Breed

Record Needles in the Camel's iPod (by Donny Kutzbach):
Buffalo Food Peculiarity
Bass in Yer Face, David Franczyk
Paul Westerberg returns… for $0.49!
RIP Tim Russert

The Sly Fox's Fantasy Football Guide (by Scott & Carl Reinecke):
Fantasy Football Player Rankings

Search Artvoice.com:

Print page Print page
Subscribe to feed Subscribe to Feed (RSS 2.0)











<http://artvoice.com/issues/v7n17/news_briefs/outspoken_for_equality> © 1990-2008 Artvoice. All rights reserved.