Getting a Grip |
The Plane Crash and The Punditby Michael I. Niman |
|
|
Donn, let Western New York grieve in peace
When I fly, I feel that I’m home when I get to the last gate and wait to board that final flight back to Buffalo. I always imagine that, even with no signage, I could find the gate by looking at the people beginning to gather. This is our community. Maybe I’m imagining it, but the folks at the gate seem to be a distinctive Buffalonian mix. These are the people I’ve chosen to spend my life with. I feel at home at this cramped gate. I never really thought about one of these flights going down. When fate caught up with a Buffalo-bound plane, the disaster stabbed a dagger into the collective soul of our community—much deeper than I could have ever imagined.
We’re now an injured, grieving population. We need to be treated gently and professionally. We’ve got no stomach for sensationalism and we don’t want our emotions toyed with. The local media, almost to a person, stood up to this challenge. Each crash victim, even those who were not a part of our community, were humanized, and their lives, diverse as were, were each celebrated for their unique attributes. Yes, the story at times seemed to drag on, but we needed to process it—to understand how death can just drop out of the sky, how fragile life is. The bottom line is that, at least in this instance, when we needed good journalism, the local press corps rose to the challenge.
There was one notable exception among Buffalo’s journalists, however. That was the Buffalo News’s Donn Esmonde. His six stories on the crash gave us no new information, instead twisting the dagger with his branded angry-man-bot formula. His series—and it’s really tough to call it that since in essence it was one article stuck on replay—culminated with a February 25 piece entitled “Winter Skies No Place for Turboprops.”
His narrative centered on a visit to the Buffalo-bound flight gate—our peeps at the airport—13 days after Flight 3407. More specifically, these were people about to board another Newark-to-Buffalo turboprop. And they now had Donn Esmonde to contend with, asking how they felt heading off onto a possibly doomed flight. He ended his story writing that he “was glad to see [the man he interviewed] and the rest of the turboprop passengers on Continental Flight 3411, Newark to Buffalo, get home safely Monday night.” In reality, however, despite the crash an ominous 13 days earlier, these Buffalo-bound passengers were much more likely to die or get injured on the way home from the airport than on what Esmonde insinuates is a death-defying turboprop ride home.
The meat of the story is that turboprops are dangerous due to icing issues and that they should be grounded because of the crash of Flight 3407, though he admits that “the great majority of turboprops flying in cold weather do not crash.” This might well be the Buffalo News’s understatement of the year.
But let’s look at the issue of icing on planes, the devil that Esmonde insinuates brought down 3407.
Media-wise, icing is to airline crashes what Middle Easterners are to terrorism stories—the knee-jerk, go-to protagonist. Just like the Oklahoma City bombing, when the national media ran out of the gate reporting the incident had all the markings of “Middle East terrorists,” icing is usually the culprit in cold climate plane crashes, until proven otherwise. One such story revolved around the October 2002 death of Senator Paul Wellstone, ostensibly due to icing on his chartered aircraft. His death flipped the Senate from Democratic to Republican control and silenced the most outspoken opponent to George Bush’s policies, helping to pave the way for the subsequent Iraq invasion, six years of reckless fiscal and environmental policies, and the squashing of all investigations into the peculiarities of the 2000 presidential election.
In the end, it turns out that “icing” was not the cause of the crash that killed Senator Wellstone. It was an easy enough story to cover. I called an associate in Gran Marais, Minnesota—someone I met years earlier while doing research for my dissertation—and asked him what the weather was like. His response was immediate: Icing shouldn’t have been a factor in the crash. No other planes reported icing problems. There was nothing out of the ordinary about the weather. That planted enough suspicion for me to write that it was too early to blame icing. In the end, after an extensive investigation, the National Transportation Safety Board ruled out icing, stating that the crash was caused by “the flight crew’s failure to maintain adequate airspeed, which led to an aerodynamic stall from which they did not recover.” The NTSB couldn’t determine why or how an experienced crew let the plane stall, leaving the death of Wellstone an unsolved mystery. In most Americans’ memory, however, the plane was brought down by icing, because that’s the story the media reported.
The Flight 3407 story is also more complex than the turboprop icing theory that Esmonde is pushing. On one level, it’s a labor story. Continental subcontracted Flight 3407 out to Colgan Air, which is a subsidiary of Pinnacle Airlines. Pinnacle and Colgan operate planes painted up with the United, Continental, US Air, Delta, and Northwest brands. By contracting out to Pinnacle and its Colgan subsidiary, the major airlines can work around their own union contracts.
The result is that Colgan can run flights cheaper since its workforce, which is currently in the process of forming a union, can be worked harder and paid less than the unionized pilots and crews employed by the real Continental, United, Delta, US Air, and Northwest. As a result, according to data collected from pilots and flight crews by Aviation Interviews, Colgan can fly planes while paying first officers less than most taxi drivers who take you to the airport ($21 per flying hour or about $19,000 per year).
Experienced Colgan captains can earn, on average, as much as a seasoned New York City sanitation worker. I would suspect that this pay structure would result in a brain drain at Colgan as experienced pilots move beyond entry-level salaries and seek union jobs with other airlines—or less stressful and more secure work tending to New York’s trash. This all comes into play because the NTSB’s preliminary investigation indicates that it was a human hand, and not ice, that pulled back the lever that pointed Flight 3407 up into its final stall. So maybe Esmonde’s title could read “Winter Skies No Place For Poorly Paid Pilots” or “Winter Skies No Place For Subcontractors of Subcontractors.” To be fair, however, it’s too early to write any of these stories—at least until the journalist writing them does more homework.
In another story about Flight 3407, Esmonde refers to a 1994 turboprop crash in Indiana. Again, he failed to mention the fact that the plane in question iced up and went down only after being ordered to circle near Chicago at an icing-prone altitude while waiting for traffic to abate at O’Hare Airport. Again, while icing was the technical cause, the plane also seems to have gone down because it iced up when it couldn’t land on time at an overcrowded hub. History, however, doesn’t blame the hub system for the crash.
Esmonde, in his “Winter Skies” piece states definitively that “Jets are safer in cold climates.” Buffalo News reporters Mary Pasciak and Susan Schulman, in a much better researched piece, report that turboprop planes were involved in half of the crashes where icing was a suspected factor. That would, one has to assume, with dirigibles out of the mix, leave jets involved in the other half. Pasciak and Schulman go on to report that of the 25 deadliest plane crashes of the past quarter century, “three were blamed, at least in part,” on icing. Of those three, two were jets—a McDonnell Douglas DC8 and a Boeing 737.
The News’s Matt Spina also did his homework, digging up a 2002 report where pilots were tested on their abilities to recover from icing-related plane malfunctions. More than half were unable to recover their planes, faulting the poor training that they had received. This reminds me of the scariest flight I ever was on—a small turboprop flight out of Buffalo on a Saab 340 aircraft. It wasn’t the turboprops that scared me, however. It was the pilot coming back into the cabin and removing the instruction manual from a locked compartment and bringing it onto the flight deck after three failed attempts to start the plane on a winter morning. They eventually hooked the plane up to some sort of jumper cable.
Add up all the data, and the problem may indeed not be the turboprop planes Esmonde was quick to demonize. Turboprops are in the air transportation mix for a number of reasons. They’re safer on short runways. In fact, some regional airports can’t accommodate commercial jets. And in runs of 600 miles or less, fuel savings can be as high as 70 percent. And yes, while the high-tech turboprop engines require more expensive maintenance than jets, these costs are more than made up for by lowered fuel costs and the lower initial price of the plane. And quite frankly, while shopping for cheap flights, I’d rather that airlines cut costs by spending less on fuel rather than spending less on pilots.
Turboprop planes also aren’t nearly as susceptible as jets, especially small regional jets, to crashing after hitting birds. New York-to-Buffalo flights might end in ice country, but they begin, year round, in bird country, with that region’s three airports all situated adjacent to waterfowl nesting areas. Yet there was no column in the New York press after the miraculous water landing of goose-crippled US Air Fight 1549, headlined “Bird-Riddled Skies No Place for Jets.” Rupert Murdoch’s sleazy New York Post didn’t even go there.
My point? At times like the Flight 3407 disaster, we need good reporting based on accurate information that’s fairly presented—not mindless headline-grabbing fear-mongering. Donn, we’re the little people you write about, the folks trying to get by on those “mean streets” and killer planes. Give us a break.
Dr. Michael I. Niman is a professor of journalism at Buffalo State College. His previous columns are available online at www.artvoice.com, archived at www.mediastudy.com and available globally through syndication.
Reader Comments
starviego 05 Mar 2009, 01:36
Media reports of the crash of Flt 3407 near Buffalo made reference to a
similar crash back in 1994 near Roselawn, Indiana, that of American Eagle
Flight 4184, an ATR 72 aircraft, which was also a high-wing, T-tail, twin
turboprop commuter aircraft. The NTSB eventually concluded that a sudden,
heavy ice buildup on the wings due to flying through 'large drop' freezing
rain, combined with a previously unknown mechanical defect--"aileron
hinge-moment reversal"--was the root cause of the crash. However, in civil
court actions against the airline and the manufacturer afterwards, the
attorneys for the foreign-made ATR manufacturer of the aircraft also
pointed to the inattentiveness of the crew while the plane spent almost 40
minutes in a holding pattern while awaiting clearance to land at
Chicago-O'Hare, and the crew's failure to take counter-measures against ice
buildup. Legal documents give us a little hint at what caused this 'inattentiveness' of the cockpit crew: http://www.cliffordlaw.com/news/attorneys-news/archive/making-a-110-million -crash-settlement-fly The 29-year-old pilot was out of the cockpit on a five-minute bathroom break, [i]socializing with the flight attendants[/i] while the 30-year-old co-pilot tried to warn him about the ice build-up...... "[b]Gettin' busy with the ladies back here[/b] . . . so if I don't make it up there within the next, say, 15-20 minutes, you know why" the recorder captured the pilot telling the co-pilot over the intercom. (6 min, 20 sec before impact) "If you could have heard the whole transcript, you would have seen [b]the attention of the crew was not on flying the aircraft[/b]" said an attorney for the aircraft maker. All the attorneys say they are bound by court order not to release the unedited version of the transcript, which apparently has quotes [b]even more explicit[/b] than "Gettin' busy with the ladies back here. . . " amid rap music audible in the cockpit. www.bluecoat.org/reports/NTSB_96_Roselawn_ATR.pdf NTSB Aircraft Accident Report --Neither the [b]flight attendant's presence in the cockpit[/b] nor the flightcrew's conversations with her contributed to the accident. However, a sterile cockpit environment would probably have reduced [b]flightcrew distractions[/b] and could have promoted an appropriate level of flightcrew awareness for the conditions in which the airplane was being operated. ATR(manufacturer) version: --The failure of the flight crew to comply with basic procedures, to exercise proper situational awareness, cockpit resource management, and [b]sterile cockpit procedures[/b], in a known icing environment, which prevented them from exiting these conditions prior to the ice-induced roll event.... --The flight crew of flight 4184 demonstrated a lack of involvement in primary duties.... --...the [b]gross distrations of this flight crew[/b] and the Captain's departure from the cockpit in known icing conditions....." --Based on [b]the lack of cockpit discipline[/b].... suggest that the report recommends that the FAA and AMR Eagle take all necessary steps to prevent the recurrence of such conduct. Reading between the lines, it appears the cockpit crew was more involved with 'entertaining' the cabin crew than flying the airplane(though both pilots were at the controls when the plane went on its fatal spin). Needless to say, the major media and the investigators didn't mention this aspect of the crash. The point is that the crash investigators will not always give us the whole truth, and the media might willingly go along with a coverup.
andrew 05 Mar 2009, 14:17
Flight 3407 was sabotaged, bottom of the story. Bush and Co. wanted to
silence 9/11 widow Beverley Eckert in order to prevent her from presenting
damning evidence to Special Prosecutor Patrick Fitzgerald about
pre-knowledge of 9/11. 9/11 was an inside job carried out by Bush, Cheney
and their fascist assortment of criminals. They killed Beverley Eckert. I wish the media would have some FUCKING BALLS. C'mon Artvoice, is this the best you can do?
starviego 05 Mar 2009, 14:30
Did you notice that the NY governor has just guaranteed free college
educations to all the victim's kids? Since when does government do that?
Oh yeah, they did that for the 9/11 victim's kids too. Kinda makes you
wonder if the state of NY has any culpability in this act, or maybe they
just feel guilty. Or maybe it's hush money.
Walters 05 Mar 2009, 15:53
This is a good article. Dr. Niman has cut through the baloney of the
Buffalo crash and some of the nonsense that appeared in the press. Some
turboprops, esepecially ATRs, have been susceptible to icing problems
because of design issues. But, the Q400 involved in this crash has an
excellent record of cold weather flying, and is not susceptible to some of
the icing issues that have cropped up in the past, such as the "tail stall"
problem that some originally thought caused the Buffalo crash.
andrew 05 Mar 2009, 16:56
yes, i did notice that Paterson fund bit in the news. I thought he was
involved immediately when I saw a picture of him in a FBI jacket or
something striding in to visit families of the victims that night at some
Clarence church. Evil and involved. "We will comfort you because we are
responsible...","Listen to our story...". Also, Tim Roemer's article in
the Buffalo News, TODAY, PEOPLE!! TODAY! about Eckert -
http://www.buffalonews.com/149/story/591714.html is COMPLETELY A COVERUP.
The 9/11 Commission was a whitewash, which Roemer was instrumental in.
Here's clip of the asshole saying the Pentagon was hit by a missile:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UX01twhfUK4&feature=related It's all a lie, people. Wake up...
Alex 05 Mar 2009, 18:38
Airplane accidents generally are never simple to analyze and most reporters
have no clue when it comes to aerodynamics, design, powerplants or
operation, but they need to fill newsprint and sound as if they are
experts. Most of the people that read newspapers also do not have much
knowledge about aviation either, so it doesn't seem to matter if the
reporting is accurate or not. Many commuter pilots have a tremendous amount of experience, even if they are only 30 years old. They may land and take off 4-5 times a day in all kinds of weather - day and night. In comparison, a major carrier pilot may have one six hour trip a day, most of it on auto-pilot. If both have 4000 hours, who do you think is the better pilot, if they are both doing what they should be doing? The airplane is in a million pieces and some reporter sticks his mike in the accident investigators face and asks, "can you tell us what happened?" Or asks a spouse anxiously waiting at the airport for news of survivors, "how do you feel knowing your husband just got killed on that flight?" Thousands of flights every day in all kinds of weather and all of a sudden it's not safe according to a journalist. If you want to know what happened, read the official accident report. The only trouble is, it takes months and it's not as sensational as a conspiracy theory or as entertaining as a journalist. They may also never be able to determine what happened. But, by then, no one cares anymore. I like professor Niman's comment about Bush - he would probably be the first person to say that he is a fair-minded, unbiased political analyst. Of course the article was about the crash, but he had to get his two cents in that everything was Bush's fault. What did that have to do with the crash? It would be nice if the news media reported news, instead of offering editorial comments in place of unbiased accuracy, but ego and bias seem to be missing from both sides today.
John J. Tormey III, Esq. 06 Mar 2009, 16:34
Justice For The Clarence Center 50 – FIRE FAA’s Lynne Osmus and Hank
Krakowski Photos and biographies of the aircrash victims, links, and the full text of this message, can be found at: http://indictsturgell.blogspot.com/2009/02/justice-for-clarence-50.html America continues to learn that the victims of the Clarence Center aviation disaster were great people. But one example: The late “Dawn Monachino of Clarence typically drove 10 hours round-trip to Pennsylvania, every two weeks, to be with her mother, who has Alzheimer’s disease”. http://www.buffalonews.com/516/story/581786.html Dawn was a hero. So were her fellow passengers. They died to make our air travel safer. But they should not have been taken from us. Quiet Rockland extends thoughts, sympathies, and prayers to families and friends of the victims of the horrible airplane crash which occurred near Buffalo, New York in the nearby hamlet of Clarence Center, Continental (Connections) Flight #3407, on Thursday/Friday, February 12/13, 2009. The crash of Flight #3407 was but part of the legacy of harmful malfeasance rendered to us by now-exited failed Acting FAA Administrator Robert Allan (“Bobby”) Sturgell, now-exited failed FAA “Safety Officer” Nicholas Sabatini - and still-in-office FAA COO Hank Krakowski and Acting FAA Administrator Lynne A. (Dobler) Osmus. The victims of the Flight #3407 crash were kind and decent people, with hopes and dreams. None of them deserved to die at the hands of malicious bureaucrats. We again call upon the President, USDOT Secretary LaHood, and Congress, to immediately remove Lynne Osmus and Hank Krakowski from FAA and from all other government work, permanently. We again call upon the President, USDOT Secretary LaHood, and Congress, to now give FAA the top-to-bottom clean-out of other FAA personnel recommended by Congressman Oberstar last year, before Flight #3407 ever happened. If the clean-out of FAA had happened already, the crash of Flight #3407 may not have happened. Finally, we want a Congressional investigation into the circumstances of the timing of the hasty departure announcement by NTSB Member Steven R. Chealander, which announcement occurred but a week after he commenced work on the February 12 Flight #3407 crash. We want answers. We want justice. We want a new FAA. Photos and biographies of the Clarence Center crash victims, and the full text of this message, can be found at: http://indictsturgell.blogspot.com/2009/02/justice-for-clarence-50.html
John Q Blogger
07 Mar 2009, 14:40
What was not mentioned was the problem with auto pilot systems being
employed during a landing in icy weather. I find it amazing that there is a
similarity to automobile cruise control systems being dangerous in icy
weather. In car owner manuals there are warning advisories against useage
of cruise control systems in ice conditions. The weekend after the plane crash my wife and I were driving down through the mountains of Pennsylvania and cars were sliding off the roads and crashing into trees. It is my belief that some of these accidents can be attributed to use of car cruise control systems. My point is that in icy condition flying or driving with automatic controls are dangerous and should not be employed for landing or taking off of planes or used for driving automobiles or trucks. Leave a Comment:
|
|
Issue Navigation> Issue Index > v8n10 (week of Thursday, March 5, 2009) > The Plane Crash and The Pundit This Week's Issue • Artvoice Daily • Events Calendar • Classifieds |







Subscribe