Artvoice: Buffalo's #1 Newsweekly
Home Blogs Web Features Calendar Listings Artvoice TV Classifieds Contact
Previous story: Local Washing
Next story: Hoyt Endorses Kearns

Filling in the Blank

Plans for a $1.5 million new-build apartment complex on a Hudson Street vacant lot draws protests


Stephanie Simeon, executive director of Heart of the City. (photo by Rose Mattrey)

Heart of the City Neighborhoods, a West Side housing nonprofit geared toward development and rehabilitation, has been working for five years to acquire state funding for two new buildings on Hudson Street between Plymouth and West Avenues. Last month, they received the sizable grant from New York’s Housing Trust Fund Corporation to break ground on eight rental units.

When a local community development organization gets a $1.5 million grant to build affordable, green housing, it’s usually cause for celebration. But some lower West Side residents don’t think this project is right for their community. They want Heart of the City to rescind the grant to create rental apartments and focus on what they do best: rehabbing existing properties into owner-occupied homes.

The three lots in question are surrounded by two vacant buildings and are overburdened with weeds and trash. Two of the lots have been vacant for almost 20 years and the house on the third burned down in 2001. The proposed plans call for two townhouse-style buildings with four units each that will complement the historic style of the neighborhood. The units will contain two to three bedrooms and are designed to be as green as possible: Energy-efficient appliances and heat-saving windows will be installed.

“There’s a misconception of affordable housing in Buffalo. It’s affordable until you pay the heat bill,” says Isabel Hartenberg, a board member of Heart of the City.

This development is part of the organization’s long-term Hudson Street Revitalization Initiative, which included the completed renovation of 263 Hudson Street, which is currently back on the market for an income-qualified, first-time homebuyer. Stephanie Simeon, executive director of Heart of the City, says the project came about through a market research study the agency conducted. Ideally, a person should be spending 30 percent of his annual income on housing, but the canvass found that residents in the neighborhood were paying upwards of 50 to 60 percent of their income for rent.

“Renting is not a crime,” Hartenberg says. “Not everybody owns a house. Not everybody can. We do a lot for owner occupants, but we have a responsibility to all the residents, not only the owners.”

Heart of the City has two more hurdles to pass before ground can be broken: approval from the city’s Preservation and Planning Boards. The plans passed through the boards five years ago, but the consent has expired and procedurally needs to be approved again before building can begin. “We’ve been talking about this for five years, so some people are just glad to see something happening,” Simeon says.

Sam Hoyt (photo by Rose Mattrey)

Others, however, are not. Fourteen residents in the immediate area of the Hudson Street lots gathered last Monday to express their concerns to New York State Assemblymember Sam Hoyt, who represents the district. Hoyt has publicly championed the project and wrote a letter of support to the grant committee based on Heart of the City’s track record and the plan’s green component. “My letter of support speaks volumes and my confidence in Heart of the City is great,” Hoyt says.

Residents told Hoyt that they felt left out of Heart of the City’s plans. The nonprofit agency had reached out to them during the initial stages of the grant process, but in the five years it took to get the money, they say, the communication slowed. “We feel like we have not been included,” says Lauren Kostek, a Hudson Street homeowner. “I’m hard-pressed to find anybody that’s not opposed to it.”

The residents presented Hoyt with a letter of nearly 50 signatures of opposition and Kostek says she will do more canvassing to add to that list.

The greatest concern expressed by Kostek and her allies is that the units would be rentals. “We just can’t babysit another building,” says Kostek. “We want to get them to see the amount of people that are right near this project that don’t want it. They’re supposed to be working with the neighborhood.”

Simeon says that she sees clearly the residents’ concerns about more rental properties in the area, but feels this project has been planned carefully enough to dodge any bullets. “Some people think we have enough rentals,” Simeon says. “I’m not disagreeing with them at all, but what we’re addressing is having housing for families that can afford it. We found that families are the key in stabilizing neighborhoods…We want to make sure we do it right, but that’s it’s done successfully.”

Hoyt says he wishes there had been development much sooner. When Heart of the City’s plans came across his desk, he felt it was the best use for the land. “I recognize as much as anyone that owner-occupied homes are the best thing for any neighborhood, but a mix is the reality,” Hoyt says. “I’m very familiar with the neighborhood and this site has remained vacant and unsightly, weed-infested and overgrown…I wish however long the property’s been vacant, a civic-minded individual would have built a single-family home there, but that hasn’t happened.”

Aaron Bartley—executive director of PUSH Buffalo, another West Side nonprofit—has a unique perspective on the controversy. As the leader of a successful housing development organization, he thinks an area needs a mix of homeowners and rentals, but also a mix of incomes and backgrounds to make it a diverse place to live. As a resident of the lower West Side, he sees the cash injection as a positive step for developing the area. “Neighborhood stabilization takes a lot of flexibility, which includes both home ownerships and rentals,” he says. “Buffalo needs high-quality affordable rentals. I support the idea that the neighborhood needs a $1.5 million investment.”

Another concern of the community used to dealing with absentee landlords is whether the property will be managed diligently. Hudson Street homeowner Dawn Drummer—a board member of Heart of the City who says she quit over this project—is worried about Heart of the City getting into a property management position, which would be a new role for the organization. “You can’t say what will happen after the ribbon-cutting, two years down the line,” says Drummer, who thinks Heart of the City should keep doing what it does best—carry out gut rehabs on homes and making them owner-occupied—instead of stepping in a new direction.

Simeon herself has experience managing more than 100 units and is a former realtor. Heart of the City will act as property manager, and costs have been built into the rent for accounting, maintenance, and snow plowing in winter. There will be a zero tolerance and annual eligibility reviews for renters, Sumeon says. Parking will be in the rear, and Simeon hopes to install a garden. Renters must be income qualified, earning between $27,000 and $54,000 a year.

“A property owner can get pitbulls and make crystal meth in his basement every bit as easily as a renter,” says Paul Morgan, a resident of the nearby Cottage District and supporter of Heart of the City’s plan.

Past projects that Heart of the City has completed include renovating an ailing commercial building at 667 Main Street into Buffalo’s first downtown hostel. They have also rehabbed three properties on Plymouth Avenue and another at 263 Hudson Street, and plan to begin work on another property on nearby Whitney Place. The organization has been in Buffalo since 1998.

Heart of the City will host a meeting to address residents’ concerns at 6pm on Monday, July 13, at the Theatre of Youth at 203 Allen Street. In the meantime, Heart of the City is still looking forward to a spring 2010 groundbreaking.

“People will ultimately be pleased,” Hartenberg says. “It looks good. It’s got all the amenities it needs to have to be a positive addition to the neighborhood.”


Reader Comments (posting new comments is closed!)

Dinah Gamin
09 Jul 2009, 09:01
As a Board of Director for Heart of the City Neighborhoods since 2003, I feel I have to respond to the above article. The only non truth is that Dawn Drummer did not resign from the board of directors, she was voted off because she attended very few meetings and we have to have board members who are active participants in our planning process. I can also attest to the fact that I never heard her voice any opposition to the Hudson Street project when she was at any of the board meetings.

Dawn Drummer
09 Jul 2009, 15:13
On 6/5/09, I sent Stephanie my resignation letter and that morning my name was still listed as a board member on the Heart of the City website. What was decided after that, I do not know but prior to that date I had not received any notice of termination. As for my stance on the project, it was my understanding that the project was for owner occupied condos and my past notes that I had kept from the meetings reflect that. Subsidized housing was never brought up during the meetings I attended.

Dick Kern
09 Jul 2009, 15:22
I fear that this project represents what I call "neo-feudalism" in a shrinking city with well over 25,000 housing vacancies, and bargain-basement housing values.

Housing in Bflo is a worse than 'Zero-sum-game'. Yet there is no effective citywide plan to address the massive surplus of housing, so each neighborhood looks out for itself.

Neighborhood activists too often demand demolition of blighted properties . . then heavily subsidized "newbuilds" to take their place, which "connected" developers are very happy to produce, becoming the 'profits of poverty'.

Yet every new housing unit in a shrinking city creates a blighted vacant house elsewhere . . . & an eventual taxpayer-funded demolition.

Having just visited Bflo from Mpls, one would think Bflo is a steadily growing city. There is new housing going up everywhere, often in places nobody lives when Bflo was over 2X larger. Ther is costly new subsidized housing in abandoned warehouses, factories & schools.

Most dramatic is "Sycamore Village" where merely 9 of 15 newbuilds on formerly toxic industrial land have been sold nearly a year later. Last fall the Mayor announced that they were "selling fast", but so far merely one of 9 sales has been to a non-Bflo-ian, despite the massive subsidies. The actual cost per house is about $400K, but average sales are an alleged "market rate" of $200K, minus a $30K BURA mortgage subsidy, with no property taxes for 7 years, up to full taxes in 10 years.

These proposed heavily-subsidized newbuild rentals on Hudson are near the heavily subsidized struggling Pine Harbor /Shoreline complex on Niagara St, where 100's of units are vacant. And on nearby streets, BMHA quietly built 61 totally subsidized duplex units several years ago on the lower WS, as they prepare to demolish empty 30 unit Redwood Village on Carolina.

Meanwhile BMHA is operating with about 835 vacancies (3114 occupied of 3950 housing units), but is spending $100's of millions to demolish sturdy old units to build new subsidized "throw-away" particleboard-&- vinyl units.

I agree with Aaron Bartley that the area needs an infusion of $1.5 million. But it should be used to rehab struggling existing housing, including energy efficiency upgrades . .and demolish long-blighted houses beyond repair, then developing creative uses for the vacant lots left behind.

Unaffordable housing costs should be assisted with Section 8 type subsidies in existing housing, not ever more costly developer-driven newbuild units.

It appears that the pipeline of cash from Albany to Bflo is drying up. HUD may become less bountiful after the "stimulus" too.

Current housing practice in Bflo is massively unaffordable. "Neo-feudalism" must be reformed into a sustainable (& affordable) housing plan for the entire city . . not each neighborhood for itself.


Ken Culton
10 Jul 2009, 14:53
One of the few things we learn about the "opposition" comes by way of a quote that reads "we just can't babysit another building." What does that mean? Why do these people care if their neighbors are owners or renters? I'm playing coy of course. Why wasn't this article entitled something like "The Gentrifiers Strike Back," or better yet "White Homeowners Sign Petition to Keep Poor Brown People Away (but the white man in charge won't listen)."

Ex-Buffalo Resident and Proud
10 Jul 2009, 15:08
Building new, green, affordable housing for working people that will be managed by professionals with experience and a strong track record. What a refreshing change from the usualy way of doing things in Buffalo.

Support coming from one community organization for another (PUSH for Heart of the City). Another break from the usual way of doing business in Buffalo.

Opposition for any project that would get Buffalo out of the ditch it is in. That's the Buffalo we all know and run from.

K
14 Jul 2009, 11:32
As a West Side renter in the nearby Cottage District, I felt compelled to respond. Although I'm a quiet person whose absolute worst trait as a neighbor is the pile of empty plant containers on the porch, there are still those who go out of their way to make me feel unwelcome in my own neighborhood. I agree with Ken that this opposition is little more than barely veiled classism, if not racism too.

From all descriptions, the property will be well-managed and well-maintained by an organization with an excellent track record. I don't understand what the big deal is. Do you prefer the vacant lot? Decent, affordable housing is the key to turning this city around. And not everyone has the ability or desire to own a home. The tenants of the potential project may be young people saving up or the elderly or disabled who can't maintain an entire home. Personally, I support it, just as I support any development taking place at the much-closer-to-home Livery.

BB
14 Jul 2009, 12:01
It has always been my understanding that a community organization is supposed to support the neighborhood. Shouldn't the people that live in the neighborhood be more of a priority than the unknown they want to build and bring in? Why is it that the people that favor this project will not be directly impacted by it? I actually heard a person say that this block was unwalkable. Once again proving that the people that are in favor of this have truly no idea of what the neighborhood is like. Subsidized housing is not a panacea for a developing area and people who have invested themselves in the neighborhood should not be disregarded as racists or classist. Or maybe that is what a so-called community organization wants to label myself and my neighbors as because they have such a barely veiled justification of this project.

Neitzsche
15 Jul 2009, 08:06
after hearing rumblings and reading the article no wonder...there is a nutcase as a board memeber. what surprises me is that they allow her to run this. shes a backstabbing drunk and shell rip the heart out of any one. i say build the thing cause i dont want her in my hood. shes a rabid psyco.

K
19 Jul 2009, 11:05
Well, BB, why don't you explain your point of view to the readers? Because, thus far, I've heard little in the way of a legitimate argument from those who oppose this project. All the opposition I've heard thus far sounds to me like "We weren't consulted every step of the way on this, so we're determined to sandbag this project as best we can" and "We're afraid of who's going to live here, despite the fact that the agency has promised to vet tenants well and act swiftly at the first sign of trouble." Again, do you and your neighbors prefer the weed-infested eyesore that this lot currently is? Do you enjoy the disruption caused by the city's once-in-blue-moon noisy and polluting mowing machines?

Community organizations are indeed supposed to support the neighborhood, but that doesn't extend to catering to every single complaint. And yes, it is possible to move into an emerging neighborhood, invest oneself in the area, and still be racist and classist.

BB
19 Jul 2009, 14:46
Certainly K,
The project had changed considerably since now becoming section 8 housing. Initially, the idea was condos or basically, a rent to own idea, allowing individuals with moderate to low incomes to afford and own a property without the additional burden of property care. This was identified over and over to the community and supported. Suddenly the project is now section 8 with no true ownership, thus no investment in the property or the neighborhood. The neighborhood is already extremely diverse with many owner occupied homes, rentals for various economic levels, and an established abundance of section 8 buildings. There are over 70+ units of section 8 housing within a 2 block radius. Some have serious issues, some are managed properly but those properties have a tendency of changing hands often and new management may not always benefit the area. Heart of the City is a non for profit that has an approximate budget to last two to six months should funding dissolve. Not a safe bet to manage property for the long term. HOTC also does not have a good track record of property management, the last large multiple being the Wilson building on Chippewa and Elmwood where they had a considerable hard time dealing with tenants. A smaller three unit was just sold by HOTC a few months ago and was poorly managed too. A prominent board member stated at the sale that they were happy to get out of the rental/management business. This track record does not instill confidence. Heart of the City is responsible for the lot, not the city so if you have a problem with the maintenance, contact the board because they are paid $500 a month to mow and shovel.
There is inadequate parking for the multiple unit. Three bedroom rentals will surely produce an overabundance of traffic and street congestion. And regardless of how you vet any renters, there will inevitably be problems. Problems that the immediate neighbors have to deal with. Not people on Auburn, or St Johns or who ever spouts about how the neighborhood is “unwalkable” or “not diverse”. Personally, I work everyday to clean, calm traffic and noise, speak with my neighbors about quality of life issues. I haven’t seen Heart of the City doing this nor have I heard of any person within the immediate area of this project support it. The owner occupied homes they produced have been ideal and a wonderful asset to the community. It’s heartbreaking to see them tear this neighborhood apart for their own self-inflated reasons. I just wish they would stick to what they know.

crumb
02 Mar 2010, 17:33
i wonder what howard stern would do? someone call sirius and ask to be connected to stern!