Artvoice: Buffalo's #1 Newsweekly
Home Blogs Web Features Events Weekly Features Classifieds Contact

Getting a Grip

Court Rules Feds at Fault for Katrina Flooding

Will Obama choose to inherit Bush's mess?

A federal district court in Eastern Louisiana just confirmed what we reported in this column 10 days after New Orleans was laid to waste by floodwaters in 2005—that the flooding of much of New Orleans was a human-made disaster.

We reported how the US Congress recognized back in 1995 that New Orleans’ aging levee system, designed to hold back the Gulf of Mexico, the Mississippi River, and Lake Pontchartrain—all massive waterways that actually tower over the geographic bowl that is New Orleans—was sinking in the muck that passes for earth in Southern Louisiana.

In response to this looming crisis, Congress created the Southeastern Louisiana Urban Flood Control Project (SELA), funded it with $430 million, and set a goal of shoring up New Orleans’ levee system by 2005—which ironically turned out to be the year that the tidal surge from Hurricane Katrina flooded the city. While it’s debatable whether $430 million would have been able to remedy the effects of neglecting the levee system for decades, the argument became academic when the George W. Bush administration, as we reported back in 2005, slashed SELA funding over 44 percent. This left funding for only 20 percent of the Army Corps of Engineers SELA budget, bringing construction to a halt on the mostly completed project, months before Katrina’s tidal surge hit.

Last week, US District Judge Stanwood R. Duval Jr., in a landmark ruling, placed the blame for the flooding of the Lower Ninth Ward of New Orleans and neighboring St. Bernard Parish directly with the Army Corps of Engineers, the federal agency tasked with maintaining Southern Louisiana’s canals and levees. According to Duval’s ruling, the ill-maintained MRGO canal, a 76-mile waterway that swelled over the last four decades to three times its designed width, brought the storm surge directly in from the Gulf of Mexico and threw it against the aging levee system protecting New Orleans and St. Bernard Parish. Specifically, Duval wrote, “It is this court’s opinion that the negligence of the Corps, in this instance failing to maintain the MRGO properly, was not policy, but insouciance, myopia and shortsightedness.”

Once having built the system, the argument goes, the Corps was responsible for maintaining it, and not letting it erode into the destructive force that it eventually became. Duval cited this lack of maintenance as “monumental neglect,” finding the Corps liable for the billions of dollars in damages (and, one would assume, the horrific loss of human life) that resulted from, as the judge put it, the “more forceful frontal wave attack on the levee.”

This decision is big. It assigns fiscal responsibility for the disaster that led to a massive diaspora displacing more than one third of New Orleans’ population. Duval’s ruling is the first sign of hope in four years that many of New Orleans’ displaced residents may finally be able to afford to come home.

This isn’t good news for everyone, however, as certain folks like the new New Orleans. The floods reengineered New Orleans’ social fabric. Gone are its poorest and youngest residents. The number of families with children under 18 living in New Orleans has dropped by a third since the floods. The number of high school dropouts declined by about 20 percent. The population of recent immigrants to the US has increased by nearly 50 percent, while the city’s black population has declined by about 10 percent. The new New Orleans has replaced much of its low-wage black workforce with immigrants, diluting the black community’s historic political power while replacing empowered workers with a more easily oppressed immigrant workforce. The number of children requiring high-cost public schooling are gone, as are most of the public schools they went to.

In order to make sure New Orleans’s poorest displaced residents didn’t return, most of the public housing complexes they lived in, including those not touched by the flood waters, were demolished. At the time, Republican Representative Richard Baker of Baton Rouge typified the racist glee some good ol’ boys couldn’t contain, explaining, “We finally cleaned up public housing in New Orleans. We couldn’t do it, but God did.”

After the city started to return to life, many tenants who previously lived in privately owned housing were barred from returning by average rent increases of 40 percent. Even many low-income homeowners found barriers prohibiting them from returning, ranging from poor or no flood insurance to the city’s failure to replace destroyed infrastructure in their former neighborhoods.

Many folks are quite happy to see New Orleans’ displaced population stay displaced. Their continued displacement, however, remains as a legacy injustice left behind by the Bush administration. Creating a means to correct this injustice is part of the “change” voters demanded in 2008. The Obama Justice Department’s decision to continue the Bush administration’s strategy of fighting against the New Orleans diaspora’s damage claims is the antithesis of change. It’s taken four long years for this groundbreaking lawsuit to snail its way through the federal court system. By all indications, the Justice Department will appeal this decision, possibly all the way to the Supreme Court—another Bush legacy—leaving New Orleans’ refugees living in limbo for another decade. If this is the path the Justice Department takes, then it will be Obama who ultimately takes ownership for the greatest domestic injustice the US has seen in the 21st century.

Dr. Michael I. Niman is a professor of journalism and media studies at Buffalo State College. His previous Artvoice columns are available at artvoice.com, archived at www.mediastudy.com, and available globally through syndication.


Reader Comments


Turin
25 Nov 2009, 17:15
If it's all about "good ol' boy" cultural racism, then, What's with the pro-immigrant policies, Hmm? Oh, I'm sorry, Mr. Band-Aid Liberal... Is something the matter? Oh, that's right: You can't utter the word "exploitation". Lmao

Matt
27 Nov 2009, 16:14
Turin: Look up "split labor market"- it's all about economics. Immigrants lack the ability to politically organize, which means they cannot demand better working conditions or higher wages. So, Mr.Business gets a larger share of the profit. And, of course, Mr.Business is very connected to Mr.Politician (or Miss). This is not very hard to understand; it's how capitalism operates.

Turin
27 Nov 2009, 18:02
Of course. But pointless liberals, like Niman, always throw sentimental dust in the air to emotionalize an issue, and thereby keep people believing that they're fighting on the moral side of what is, simply, a cultural war (and an attack on blacks by whites). That, they're the defenders of the weak and the powerless, for no other reason.

And, doing so, maintains the image of their own purity of motive while they continue to sell out, both, the white and the black (openly and behind the scenes), via patently corrupt doctrine-driven policies, like Affirmative Action. My comment is merely to demonstrate the *lack* of purity inherent to this moral posturing by innocently pointing out the obvious fact that he has unwittingly played one minority against another in his ongoing crusade that whites are evil.


Well, there's just as big of a case to be made for the historic sufferings of, and discrimination against, Latin America by European whites. Is this a question of Right and Wrong or is it a question of national boundaries and technicality? If the latter, then how can the powerless *ever* achieve parity? If the former, then what's the point in blaming whites over the illegal immigrants?

Either, *both* of the minority groups, in question, are in the moral right, or *both* are in the moral wrong. If the writer acknowledges that both are in the right, then, he takes a position against the corrupt unions. If he claims that both are wrong, then he no longer has a product to sell to the "do the right thing" market ...which, is all that he's really doing. So, since he's really just playing market politics, and thereby must refuse to make any consistent sense, then he - and his type - must also blame whites in a capricious, unjust way that solves nothing, further builds up class hatreds and keeps those of us who are directly involved, at each other's throats.



U-know
28 Nov 2009, 01:58
Apply this same court case finding to local decisions that the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers have made; I.E.-Lewiston's nuclear nightmare with burials direct to soils and in a leaking "containment facility" (read-old building basements), capricious and unilateral changes to federal laws concerning these substances and the lack of consideration regarding geological faults and the possibility of a catastrophic failure (of the Niagara Falls Storage Site) right here in WNY!
Sleep well all.

U-know II
28 Nov 2009, 02:08
To WIT:
http://www.wnypapers.com/news/2009/11/a5_response.html
See: "earthquake."

Mark
28 Nov 2009, 12:15
Right. Most liberals are just opportunistic weirdos who've rarely contributed anything meaningful to anything, and they don't care when their symbolic issues run into immovable objects and implode. Do the right thing? Does a cockroach do the right thing or does it just try to survive in whatever way "works"?

In this situation the two most important forces at work displacing the black population are the hurricane and the illegal immigrants who've crossed the borders. To blame immigrants he has to play up racism or he has two other options: To find himself being too loud aboutattacking another minority group (and getting in trouble with his own party), or being consistent with his premise and attacking lax Republican policies as the root cause that deliberately allowing them to slip into the country. The problems with the second option are that it is too much like agreeing with anti-immigrationists (even though that's what he's doing) and that we now have a minority (half black) President who is "surprisingly" doing the wrong thing by pursuing the same policies as his evil white predecessor much to his party's public confusion. This is what will defeat them not "racism".

Therefore it's time for some damage control. Even though "Katrina" is really the fault of the hurricane and the illegals and even the evil Republicans and even though his party just won a court victory for this he knows that his man isn't holding up his own end on anything and that's the real reason why their victory won't do any good. But he isn't going to recriminate his paper tiger messiah of anything direct and practical like not keeping a campaign promise to create public works programs and rebuild places like New Orleans. That's just too honest and makes too much sense for the corrupt liberals. So blame racism again.



George
01 Dec 2009, 18:37
GLOBAL WARMING HAS BEEN PROVEN A FRAUD. Research "climate gate". UN scientists deliberately fudged the numbers. Carbon credits only benefit the big bankers. Carbon is a life giving gas. A carbon tax payable to the big banks allow the government to control your life. Man-made global warming is a scam. DEBATE OVER. Wake Up!

Fox News is a Proven Fraud
10 Dec 2009, 20:14
Global warming deniers are on a par with Holocaust deniers. But until healthcare reform becomes a reality, frontal lobotamies and over medicating will continue being prescribed as the cheapest quick fixes.

Leave a Comment: