Artvoice: Buffalo's #1 Newsweekly
Home Blogs Web Features Calendar Listings Artvoice TV Classifieds Contact
Previous story: Lit City: literary events listing
Next story: Generational Theft

Lies Your Teacher Told Me

In the February 12 issue of Artvoice, David Cohen wrote a letter to the editor criticizing my February 5 column entitled “The Truth,” for citing James Loewen’s book, Lies My Teacher Told Me, which Cohen described as an out-of-date source. Cohen argued that most of the misinformation cited in the book is no longer taught by public school teachers. The problem is that Cohen was referring to an earlier out of date edition of Lies. The book that I cited was “completely revised and updated” in 2007, when it became a national bestseller that should be on the radar of any history teacher. The underlying message of the new version of Lies is that public schools are still teaching the same basic myths despite over a decade of new scholarship in the field that has debunked as fiction much of what is being published in new texts.

For a case in point, Cohen cites the 2005 Prentice Hall text, America, Pathways to the Present, for a passing mention of settlers digging up Indian graves and eating their corpses. This, he felt, negates my complaint that this information is not being adequately taught. Had Cohen done his research, however, he’d see that the new edition of Lies extensively cites and deconstructs the 2005 text that he is praising. Yes, it gives a passing mention of cannibalism among the colonists, which few other books even mention, but it frames it as an aberration, which it wasn’t. And it ignores wider instances of cannibalism and what evolved into a long tradition of robbing native graves (the results of which are evident to anyone who has visited our major history museums).

Pathways appears indeed to be among the least worst of the corporate textbooks in use today—but that is not good enough. Pathways should be abandoned by the Buffalo Public Schools because of its whitewashing of institutional racism in American history. Loewen points out, for example, how it dismisses Woodrow Wilson’s vocal and avowed white supremacist views (Wilson had a big soft spot for the KKK) with one line mentioning how his cabinet allowed for continued Jim Crow segregation in the federal government. Pathways praises slave owner Thomas Jefferson for an imagined opposition to slavery while ignoring his advocacy for the westward expansion of the institution and the argument that Jefferson whipped and raped some of his 267+ slaves.

I can go on with a point by point criticism of Pathways, but the fact remains that Pathways does represent a marked improvement over most other books in use in America’s classrooms. The problem is, least worst is just not good enough.

Cohen, based on his ignorance regarding the shortcomings of his favored text and the publication date of the work that I cite, writes that my column would fail the minimum requirement of a middle school grading rubric. Such comments are nasty and counterproductive for a historical debate. But worse, in this instance, Cohen’s nastiness turned out to be rash and foolhardy. Assuming that he is a middle school history teacher, as I suspect, I’d like to think that he’d take more time to fact-check and grade his own students work before rushing to judgment as he appears to have done regarding my column.

Michael I. Niman



Artvoice reserves the right to edit letters for content and length. Shorter letters have a better chance at being published in their entirety. Please include your name, hometown, and contact number. E-mail letters to: editorial@artvoice.com or write to: Artvoice Letters, 810 Main Street, Buffalo, NY 14202




Reader Comments (posting new comments is closed!)

Dan
24 Feb 2009, 18:59
Perhaps we ought to add "reading comprehension" to that list of grade school subjects that apparently confound Dr. Niman. His reply cannot justify its condescension when one sees just how hard Dr. Niman blusters and postures to conceal his backpedaling.

Dr. Niman originally wrote:
"In his now classic book, Lies My Teacher Told Me, sociologist James Loewen examines high school American history textbooks and how they whitewash American history—for example, skipping unsavory bits like the cannibalism at Jamestown and the robbing of Indian graves at Plymouth, while rationalizing wars of expansion and sugar-coating anti-native genocide."

To which Mr. Cohen replied:
"Further, at page 45 of the eighth grade text, America, Pathways to the Present (Prentice Hall 2003), there is a set-out of the following lovely quotation from the diary of a Jamestown settler: 'So great was our famine, that a Savage we slew and buried, the poorer sort tooke him up againe and eat him…'"

Against which Dr. Niman wrote:
"For a case in point, Cohen cites the 2005 Prentice Hall text, America, Pathways to the Present, for a passing mention of settlers digging up Indian graves and eating their corpses. This, he felt, negates my complaint that this information is not being adequately taught."

The original claim, as written, was that this information was being "skipped." Mr. Cohen, correctly observed that Jamestown cannibalism is, in fact, present in texts read by grade school students. Perhaps Dr. Niman believes "skipped" to be a proper euphemism for "not adequately taught," but odds are more likely that he is changing his position to reflect that he has been caught in an inaccuracy.

It does not matter if Mr. Cohen felt that the passing mention of settlers digging up Indian graves and eating their corpses negates the claim that the information is not being adequately taught, because Mr. Cohen was never given a chance to evaluate the claim of whether or not a passing mention constitutes adequate teaching. It was never presented. The only claim Mr. Cohen has addressed is the original claim mentioned above, i.e. that this information is flat skipped.

I somehow doubt Dr. Niman will issue an apology for his misunderstanding.