Show Me Your Heroes
by Michael I. Niman
... And I'll show you your society
Recently, on a commercial air flight, just before landing, the pilot came on the PA system and admonished us to all give a round of applause to our armed forces, in particular to any “veterans or active-duty military members who might be on the plane.” It was an awkward moment. Some folks clapped, some looked confused or annoyed, and some both clapped and glanced with scorn at the non-clappers. Our culture hasn’t really evolved a common response for orders to applaud on command—especially for arbitrary reasons. I mean, this wasn’t really an armed services moment. It was a routine public transit experience, like a train pulling into a station.
But hey, I slapped my hands together for a few rounds. There are idealists among those who join the military, and they risk their life for their beliefs. That’s commendable. But as our wheels screeched against the runway, I started thinking about who else deserved my applause. Hell, what about the flight attendants? They had just nursed us through some turbulence, continuing to make their rounds even when the ride got bumpy and the “fasten seat belt” icons lit. They regularly work under hellacious conditions for far less pay then they deserve, making our whole air transportation system possible. And, like members of the armed forces, they’re prone to real heroism when things go awry. They sit among us on the plane, their heroism unrecognized and their service habitually unthanked. How about a round of applause for the flight attendants?
As we taxied around the airport, my mind kept racing. What about line cooks and dishwashers? Their jobs suck, but they soldier on, keeping many of us fed, while barely making enough to feed their own families. There are some heroics: a single parent raising children on an Applebee’s salary. I’d clap for her.
In the terminal was a billboard “saluting” the military—the folks we’d just applauded. Sure, they’re passing through the terminal and could use some recognition. But so are elementary school teachers, social workers, snow plow drivers, dental hygienists, bus drivers, plumbers, DMV clerks, toll collectors, welders, highway pavers, census takers, garbage collectors, grocery store clerks, eldercare and childcare providers, licensed practical nurses, hospital orderlies, janitors, utility line workers, payroll clerks, house painters, and workers in a thousand other underappreciated professions. Their unrecognized toil, like a soldier’s heroism, keeps our society functioning. Where are the billboards welcoming them to their rushed sojourn through the Atlanta airport?
Then there are the taxi drivers, slaughterhouse workers, hourly construction helpers, and migrant farm workers who can’t afford air travel and will never pass through this terminal, but who die on the job or contract chronic, work-related injuries or diseases with alarming frequency. When are we going to command a plane load of travelers to applaud for these people, who literally give their lives in service to a society that will use them up and toss them aside without so much as a “thank you”? Who nailed the roof onto your house?
I don’t want to wax on here, but we’re surrounded with daily heroics: a battered spouse who survives abuse and raises a family; someone surviving hate and war, yet maintaining their compassion and humanity; people who overcome a plethora of personal adversities but still manage to care for and inspire their neighbors. We’re surrounded every day by heroes from whose sacrifices we all benefit, but no pilot ever makes an announcement to recognize them and no airport ever erects a sign to welcome them.
Earlier this summer I went to see a fireworks display at a small Central New York village’s annual festival. A band played before the show, entertaining a small crowd sprawled out on a lawn, drinking beer, eating barbecue, and chatting up each other. Midway through the band’s last set, seemingly after they’d struggled though every other song they knew, the vocalist dedicated the next song to “the troops.” It was the “The Star-spangled Banner.” And it was a mega-awkward moment as folks jumped up to attention from their lazy sprawls like toast suddenly popping out of the toaster. Some spun around with their hands on their hearts, but alas, there was no flag to salute. About half the audience eventually froze, standing at attention. Half of those folks had their hands on their hearts, facing every which way. We know what to do when the national anthem comes on at the beginning of a hockey game, for instance, but it’s not fair to spring it on a bunch of unsuspecting people relaxing and listening to music. Simon says, “Salute the troops now!” But how? What are we supposed to do? Then the divisive anger sets in, with bewildered saluters, twirling in search of a flag, scowling at those who just kept drinking beer and chatting, like they did during the last song and will do during the next. Why do we need to suffer these moments?
A few years ago in Buffalo, the city government erected metal street signs memorializing the spots where police officers died in the line of duty—died as civil servants serving the citizens of Buffalo. The single largest cause of these deaths was vehicular accidents. Other city workers have died in vehicular accidents while on the job, but we don’t memorialize them. The second largest cause of death for police officers was violent assault. Likewise, we’ve got a running death toll for murdered taxi drivers, convenience store clerks, pizza delivery drivers, and other private sector workers, who, like the slain officers, also gave their lives serving the residents of Buffalo. But we don’t erect signs memorializing them, either. So why do we have this double standard?
The problem isn’t memorializing fallen police officers or celebrating the troops. They deserve recognition for their sacrifices and their contributions. The problem lies with the rest of us—with a society whose definition of hero seems narrowly limited to those who wear uniforms, carry guns, or have quasi-military ranks. This elevation of the police and military above all other forms of heroism is called militarism. To date, no democratic society has been able to exist in harmony with such a value system.
Reader Comments (posting new comments is closed!)
|
Peter A Reese 23 Sep 2010, 03:51
How about recognizing the movers and shakers in our local community? With faint recognition (other than the occasional embarrassing fawning in the Buffalo News) a small cadre of our community's best and brightest toils in secrecy on every board of every entity which spends taxpayer dollars. These heros manage to get by on trust fund payments and the proceeds of the businesses built by their ancestors. They do the heavy lifting and make every decision of importance to the welfare of WNY. God bless them for all they do for us poor dumb brutes.
lostfooting 23 Sep 2010, 08:10
Just another article to incediouly bring your view of America as a united nation to a halt.
Peter A Reese 23 Sep 2010, 08:35
"incediouly" The word you've entered isn't in the dictionary. Click on a spelling suggestion below or try again using the search bar above. Please speak English, Bubka, we are in American now. In the old country we spoke the old language, now that we are Americans, we speak American.
Hopkins 23 Sep 2010, 17:13
Article sux.. why don't you write 42344 more articles crying about wanting to block traffic with your bike.
Chuck Culhane 23 Sep 2010, 20:25
Half my friends are brilliant others are nincompoops but of all things I find hideous it's a dimmy who can't spell insidious! git on outta here!
John D. 23 Sep 2010, 22:08
Another article by an idealistic, unexperienced, anti-american, who spends his days stroking his ego with each press of the keys on an Apple while sipping on a $10 soy latte. I suppose the public should consider the writer a hero as well, considering one has been able to accomplish oh so much through his most intelligent writings. This article just exemplifies the 'everyone deserves a star' attitude of a socialist.
trish 23 Sep 2010, 23:45
don't get the comment above from John d. about attitudes of socialists. Makes no sense. I thought Michael Niman's ideas about heroes requires some thought. We send people to war, they come back (or not) with disfigurations that are physical and mental. In the last "few" wars we have ground up soldiers for oedipal reasons(Iraq) and capitalistic gains(again, Iraq, think Halliburton). Americans fight taxes; taxes would pay for rehabilitation for these vets. Our country rallies loudly around tax reduction, how can we reduce taxes and keep our commitment to those we use as fodder for our wars? So a round of applause in a plane seems pretty empty for those it intends to honor; and self congratulatory for those who offer it.- And in the meanwhile, our elderly and our children are taken care of by aides making minimum wage. And they suffer and are abused. Aides can't take planes, they cost too much. so they don't even get empty clapping hands. The point here, I think, is that it is easy to wave a flag, sing a song, and rail loudly against the status quo. Much harder to change it.
geezerwheeze 24 Sep 2010, 09:15
Great article.
MPSmith 24 Sep 2010, 12:59
Once again, Mike's articles garner comments with absolutely no relation to the text itself. Reminds me a lot of the comments you hear from the right-wing masses... just a bunch of big words, of which they don't know what the meanings are, and they cannot justify _why_ they are even labeling them as such. Oh wait, they said it on Fox news... so it must be true. @John D. "Another article by an idealistic, unexperienced, anti-american, who spends his days stroking his ego with each press of the keys on an Apple while sipping on a $10 soy latte. I suppose the public should consider the writer a hero as well, considering one has been able to accomplish oh so much through his most intelligent writings. This article just exemplifies the 'everyone deserves a star' attitude of a socialist." John, while no part of your comment really has any bearing on the article, or is even substantiated (maybe you're painting a picture of yourself?) - What the hell have you done, besides attempt to label someone with a bunch of unrelated and villifying comments, to contribute... well... anything... to the society you live in?
Eric 24 Sep 2010, 15:12
Great article. It touches on subjects that the non-empathetic authoritarian types will never understand, sadly.
Turin 26 Sep 2010, 15:29
Lmao @ "Everyone deserves a star". John D. nailed it. MPSmith, OTOH, is grasping for some kind of a scathing rebuttal to John and his proper shaming of Niman and Niman's escapism into the pettiness of the asinine, piddly liberal. This article, quite simply, stinks ...in that, it displays the usual lack of heart in today's liberal. I was thinking that, perhaps, Doc Mike was clueing us in onto an uncovered pressure-tactic campaign designed to support today's military-industrial complex. But, I am more of the opinion that he was ashamed that he gutlessly joined in with the applause around him (in the eyes of the others who had the spine to refrain) and needed an outlet, as well as a moralization, to justify his wimpishness. ...No doubt, while his moderate's balls were still rolling under the seats of the more relevant people on that plane, his mind was - in reality - already digging up these tired, old platitudes about under-unappreciated service workers - for no other reason, but - because the under-appreciated stewardess who witnessed his applause ...also witnessed the wet spot, that formed around his crotch, after he stood up.
Peter A Reese 26 Sep 2010, 19:00
@Turin: Are you a urologist or just fixated on genito-urinary medical conditions? Let's say we all agree with you that Niman sucks. Do you have anything else to say?
Turin 27 Sep 2010, 05:08
@The troll, not really from Buffalo: Are you a psychiatric patient or just fixated on disrupting forums, with lame mindgames, as an outlet for your lack of employment (or, both?) Let's say we all agree with me that Niman didn't make the point that I mentioned. Do you ever have anything to contribute? ...Go find acceptance at Outcome Buffalo. ;D
Jenna Witkowski 27 Sep 2010, 14:09
I thought this article written by Mr. Niman was interesting and thought-provoking. I did not look at it in any light as a negative perception of the military or those who serve in the armed forces in our country. Of course their dedication and heroism should be appreciated. Without them, who knows where we would be? I do however get Mr. Niman's point that there are many people in our nation who contribute and never really get much (or any) recognition for their part/role in our society. There are everyday "heroes" all around us, in our nation, our local communities, and even our own families. The larger point of the article is this: we take for grated A LOT in the United States. We take for granted all the things and services that are available to us, with ease. We tend to under-appreciate those who provide services, especially at lower-paying jobs. While I don't feel Mr. Niman was trying to discredit anyone or anything, I feel the big-picture point-of-view of all this is to take a look around and be thankful now and again for ALL that goes on around us and for everyone who contributes to our society and provides services that make our lives easier, safer, and as comfortable as they get to be. Whether you are pro or anti-war, identify as democrat or republican, are black or white, male or female, you should be able to see what Mr. Niman was really alluding to with his literary contribution. Thank you for taking the time to address this Mr. Niman, and to attempt to get some people to actually think outside of the box for once.
Julie Occhino 27 Sep 2010, 18:45
The next time you step off a plane, you may want to kiss the ground and be thankful that you live in the United States of America. The freedom you enjoy as a writer was provided by someones Son or Daughter who served this Country.
Beat 27 Sep 2010, 22:35
Julie: Excellent point. Lets give a bit round of applause to the ACLU, The Berkeley Free Speech Movement and Alan Ginsberg as well.
Paul Elam 28 Sep 2010, 04:25
ROTFL! Nice call, Turin. There's nothing of substance in this article that I can see except for a cowardly little anti-war wannabe who supported the troops when the heat was turned up just a little and needed an excuse. Then he speeded back home to his keyboard afterward to make a bunch of trite comments online that would supposedly assert his liberal credentials, when - yes - all they support is his true agenda. "Oh! Let's support underpaid teachers and nurses! I mean, if we're going to support troops - THAT'S the only reason that I applauded!" I'm going to be sick, please excuse me.
Kate 28 Sep 2010, 16:44
What's really annoying is that "support" of this type is empty. It's easy to clap on demand when some random pilot or shitty cover band asks you to, or to slap a magnetic ribbon on your car. It's harder to advocate for better post-war care, to hire veterans and encourage others to do so, and to just generally do things to keep the issues of veterans in the forefront. Wearing a "support the troops" t-shirt doesn't make you a veterans' advocate. It makes you a shopper.
Turin 28 Sep 2010, 17:33
What it comes down to is that if you don't support the war, then, you shouldn't support the troops, either. Liberals: Self-serving, walking and talking ideological inanities. They make absolutely no sense about anything. All that they care about is finding their sad, plodding, petty little places within an ugly mob - which is, primarily, ugly because they are part of it. *That's* what they "contribute". Lmao.
Paula 28 Sep 2010, 21:17
Turbin: Why do you think this is a "liberal" issue, per se. I re-read the who article and I don't see it. Are you ceding the who notion of giving equal respect for working folks and resisting militarism to liberals? I'm a libertarian Tea Party conservative, and I ain't gonna cede that ground bubba.
Art Lemasters 29 Sep 2010, 04:54
Porka: Only an idiot without the most rudimentary grasp on American politics wouldn't understand that the author is a liberal. Go play your childish psyche games back at your homosexual men's news site. You're an amateur. Learn to write coherently too. You could learn something about that from your betters like Turin. Astute comments as always, Turin - you rock!
stoptheinsanity 29 Sep 2010, 09:50
Turin...are you even a vet or a member of the military? I am a vet. I always support our troops whether I support their mission or not. The troops dont get to make the decision as to where they are deployed. That does not mean we disown them if we dont agree with what their mission is. Your "Dubya" "either you are with us or against us" mindset is sophomoric at best......
John Galt 29 Sep 2010, 13:14
Truly erudite commentary, Turin. Someday an enlightened civilization is going to look back at the collective disease that we now call "liberals" and history will remember them as a loosely organized movement that exploited society's marginally useful trash together with society's marginally educated defectives. Their mob ideology of waffling will be scoffed at on the same level as orally transmitted tradition, vis-a-vis Boadicea and other historically laughable examples of prancing savagery. We don't have a draft yet. No one makes a "soldier" enlist so he-she is without excuse for not thinking the future through if they get sent out on an evil mission. The purpose of the military is not to create educational opportunities for enlistees or jobs for mediocre civilian parasites looking for their piece of the pie. They will answer to a higher authority for the crimes they commit. Thank you for posting.
Dan R 29 Sep 2010, 14:23
*yawn* This article is not thought provoking. It is old-left regurgitated. Someone could have written the same thing in the forties and it would have sounded just as fresh. And this line: "To date, no democratic society has been able to exist in harmony with such a value system." is simply stupid. It is baseless conjecture to assume that a democratic society is incompatible with a society that values people who, ostensibly, work dangerous positions that directly preserve the physical safety of citizens. You can argue, if you choose, that the current military is not making our country any safer (or even that it is making it less safe) and you can claim that the police do not "fight crime" but instead are a force for maintaining the status quo for the wealthy elite (or whatever). But there are many people who believe that both the military and the police are forces for good and that they have the most dangerous and important task of affecting this good. For people who believe this, the claim that "no democratic society has been able to exist in harmony with such a value system" is not only false, but the falseness of the contrapositive seems absolutely intuitive, i.e. that a society that does not have such a value system can exist as a democracy. To many, lofty writings are one thing but a democratic society in the face of threats both internally and externally that seek to disrupt the function of our democratic self-determination by means of, oh, I don't know, terrorizing the populace in to submission must value those that actively risk their lives to preserve the democratic order. In this way, Dr. Niman's statement, in the eyes of many Americans, is easily turned on its head. Instead, it is that: IN ORDER for a democratic society to exist, we must honor those that risk their lives for its preservation. Once this simply point is understood, all the tomfoolery about honoring butchers and bakers and other such socialism-lite BS goes out with window. For this article to be thought provoking, it should have first provoked the thought that perhaps Dr. Niman shouldn't have penned it.
wil 30 Sep 2010, 23:02
How amusing, Someone who uses a Tolkien character for a moniker lecturing a college professor. Stay in your fantasy world (ie:Your parent's basement) while the rest of us deal with the "real world" problems created by people of your "ilk". Your whole agenda was revealed the moment you started the ad-hominems. All the conservatives posting on here are so superficial. Instead of attacking points in the article they disagree with, they immediately try to label and define people they disagree with by throwing out false accusations combined with adolescent bullying. I laugh at you people and your worthlessness to society. You contribute nothing to the conversation except hyperbole and contentiousness. You people are whats wrong with America. You may call it conservatism but most intelligent people know it by it's other name... FASCISM!!!!!
Turin 01 Oct 2010, 16:40
Lmao ...how pathetic: The finest in demanding the sanction of the victim. Ayn Rand was right about the jealous, snarling scum around us - with their pitifully transparent demands for government jobs. Go back to your father's favorite tree ...we know who you really are. ;D Thanks, John. Great insights. Boadicea is a humorous example. She would probably appeal to Niman as a historical figure of equally "heroic" stature ...to the other "fine" examples that he cited here. This being the aftermath of the Iraq war, the liberal ilk are all anticipating lining up for their new roles "treating" the callous murderers who did something that they supposedly didn't support. In that respect, this article is also a blurb. If they didn't really support it, then they wouldn't support them on their return home from their evil deeds, either. It's that simple. However, the truth is that they do support this war, and always did. They always support the establishment, and they do it by also functioning as a false opposite to the issues that they ostentatiously oppose. Their cynical intent is to make the Hegelian dialectic work in their favor by moving the point of synthesis (the "center") to emerge well within capitalist boundaries of soft socialism. This - hopefully - provides permanent, guaranteed employment to all of the nurses, teachers, social workers and other so-called "health" services (and "community" related) scum, along with the rest of the sleazy machine that keeps them and the rest of their mediocre largesse employed. IOW, this is another way for them to manufacture a specific problem to solve.
Chuck Culhane 03 Oct 2010, 14:57
@Turin You calling people scum? You effete a-hole, with your big mouth and litle heart -- I know you. Coward.
KRP 03 Oct 2010, 16:21
Turin!
Turin 05 Oct 2010, 05:10
Lmao@Pervert Paul ...AKA "mental case". "Mentor" any more "young men", lately, Stalker? I guess it doesn't matter, since you no longer have your license. ...Go flush yourself. |
|
Issue Navigation> Issue Index > v9n38 (Fall Food Issue, week of Thursday, September 23) > Show Me Your Heroes This Week's Issue • Artvoice Daily • Artvoice TV • Events Calendar • Classifieds |







