Jeff Peterson
Featured News NXIVM

Heidi: Peterson has opened up a huge can of worms – tying NXIVM to Arizona Mafia

By Heidi Hutchinson


Couple of nibbles for further food for thought in the Jeff Peterson lawsuit:

– Former Mexican Pres. (2000 – 2006) Vincente Fox’s daughter was one of the original Mexi-Nexians (Mexican NXIVM members) in the early ‘00’s. I know she was a Nx member while my sister was alive up to 2002.

William Jefferson Clinton and Jeffrey Peterson

Pres. Fox turned out to be another PRI (Salinas ruling family) puppet even though he was first elected to be Mexico’s savior from the Salinas regime oppression.

– Fox attended Harvard University.

– Carlos Slim Helú, whose primary family ancestry is Lebanese not Hispanic or Mexican, also attended Harvard.

– Dennis Burke is rumored to be very tight with former Secret Service Director, Mark Sullivan. Sullivan is now with “Torchstone” — a private security/investigation firm based in Arizona — which employs many retired or former US agents from FBI, CIA, DOD, SSA and, of course, Secret Service.

– Sullivan himself appeared at KAR’s initial bail hearing prepared to provide protective services for KAR.

– IMO, Torchstone was hired many months (if not years) prior to KAR’s arrest to, essentially (and, perhaps unwittingly) set up a defense — possibly “masterminded” by Burke, KAR and Emiliano with some Saltzman thrown in — by making scapegoats out of KAR’s “enemies” along with Burke’s “enemies,” chiefly Jeff Peterson.

– KAR’s first claim was that the whole branding, slavery scheme was “the product of criminal minds.”

– For years, Nx has indeed attempted to “criminalize” it’s enemies with some unfortunate degree of success. Once labeled as “criminals,” it, of course, becomes much easier to accuse and scapegoat these “criminal minds” — blame and frame the “criminals” for any and all illegal or nefarious activities perpetrated by Nx or Nx partners.

– Carlos Slim Helú owns a huge chunk (perhaps controlling interest) in the New York Times.

The NYT staged the Nx fluff piece interviews, including Allison Mack’s public “admission,” took place in December 2017. Some interviews were done in Mexico, others in New York. The NYT did not release or held the story for over 6 mos. until about the time of Mack’s arrest, after other scapegoat/set-up attempts and defense strategies (the “criminal minds” strategy) failed. IMO.

– Dennis Burke likely orchestrated a coverup since at least 2014, when Peterson was recruited by ESO (Emiliano) to join Nx.

– KAR, Nx, as Jeff Peterson suggests, could have long served as the “fall guy” for the Human Trafficking/money laundering by Salinas regime — except that Nx and KAR “Bronfman/Raniere crime syndicate, were also obviously controlling the US/Vancouver operations.

Personally, I’d like to thank Mr. Peterson for helping keep me out of an insane asylum when I starting suspecting and blabbering that I was being tailed by not just Nx chicks (the usual suspects) but by Secret Service vehicles and a couple of faces I thought I recognized from back in the day when we were producing “In the Line of Fire” and were under surveillance for security clearance purposes.

Turns out, Keith had claimed I was out to kill him, that I had threatened and stalked him (in 2011) and he required Torchstone’s protection from me and others. Keith also claimed these alleged death threats by myself and others were the reason he and Clare fled to Mexico.

Telling ya, the truth really is stranger than…

PS:  Wouldn’t the statutes be tolled to the latest incidents which occurred over this past summer when Peterson had to go into hiding as Frank Report reported?

I’m amazed Peterson isn’t falsely placed in prison and/or lived to tell his story. And whether or not his lawsuit is quashed these revelations demand a thorough, non-partisan investigation.

About the author

Frank Parlato


Click here to post a comment

Leave a Reply

    • It’s a pull-together edit from my comments on this topic — Frank’s “work” actually. But thanks for the props! I’m freeing up some time soon to start contributing here in earnest. We all need to get on board to get to the bottom of this.

  • Jeffery Peterson is representing himself. Does that sound like a valid lawsuit?

    Jeff isn’t an attorney. But, he’s suing several attorneys. Plus, if the actions happened in Arizona, then venue for the case is Arizona (or where the Defendants reside), not Massachusetts.

    • A valid lawsuit is one that asserts valid claims and survives motions to dismiss, eventually finding its way to trial. The guy filed it himself. So what. Read his history, he has won many lawsuits before, in the millions, against sophisticated parties.

      First of all: How do you know what his education is? Are you sure about what you wrote?

      Second of all. The lawsuit is brand new, it was filed exactly one day ago. How do you know other counsel won’t file an appearance?

      Third of all: As you surely know with your extensive legal education and knowledge of all things, it doesn’t matter where the Defendants reside, if they are subject to personal jurisdiction under the Massachusetts long-arm statute. The MA Federal Court certainly has subject matter jurisdiction. Looks to me like the key parties were Directors of the company named throughout the lawsuit, with headquarters in Cambridge, Mass., which brings them in to the jurisdiction of the Commonwealth. And other named parties conduct business in Mass. or throughout the United States. Certainly, the long arm of the Federal Court extends to the national news publications named as Defendants. Are you sure about your jurisdictional doubts? Here’s some research notes for your legal mind.

      Good Hope Indus., Inc. v. Ryden Scott Co., 378 Mass. 1 (1979); Hannon v. Beard, 524 F. 3d 278, 280 (1st Cir. 2008). Any effect a nonresident defendant’s activity may have had upon commerce in Massachusetts is considered in determining whether it transacted business in the Commonwealth. Droukas v. Divers Training Academy, Inc., 375 Mass 149 (1978). Indeed, “merely a few acts on [a defendant’s] part can often suffice to satisfy [subsection 3(a)]’s threshold for transacting business.” Best in Sports, Inc. v. Olympiakas Basketball Club of Greece, 2010 U.S. Dist. Lexis 140188 (Bowler, J., 2010) quoting The Scuderi Group, LLC v. LGD Tech., LLC, 575 F. Supp. 2d 312, 319 (D. Mass. 2008).

      You posted on the other Peterson article, citing Arizona’s SOL for Defamation claims. Which Arizona party are you, NoisyMouse?

    • I didn’t realize he was representing himself, NoisyMouse. That’s pretty weird, considering how complicated of a situation this is….
      It’s obviously a bogus case, because he can’t expect to win. So what is his agenda?

      • Peterson litigated a big case himself as a pro per in Arizona, against a party who sued him, named Behar. It was publicized at the time. When the case was filed, Behar was as arrogant and dismissive about Peterson as the trolls posting here.

        Peterson’s counsel joined the lawsuit to defend the Corporate parties while Peterson represented himself against the Behar parties. At the time, he was interviewed by the Arizona Business Journal where he stated he preferred to manage the case himself with assistance of his Attorneys. The case was litigated by the very arrogant Behar and went to trial before a full jury two years later. The result was a complete victory for Peterson as a pro per and $188,000 judgment in favor of Peterson’s company, which was collected in full from Behar as can be seen on the historical docket where the satisfaction of judgment was filed. Two years after Peterson’s successful win at trial, Peterson sued Behar for defamation and collected another $250,000 in a settlement. Still think Peterson “can’t win?” The case numbers are CV2005-004439 and CV2009-012871, respectively. Peterson’s Attorney is only listed in his individual capacity due to the collection from the satisfaction of the $188k judgment. You can look them up online at the Maricopa County Superior Court in Arizona.

        As for your comment that “he can’t expect to win,” because you apparently didn’t see the evidence provided in link on the other post, we can re-post it here. Watch and learn.


    • That is a rather shill-ish comment, which is what you have done your entire time here.
      Attack legitimate people, only now you have to do it more politely.

%d bloggers like this: