News NXIVM

Raniere, not Mexican lawyers, composed threatening letters to silence witnesses; Betancourt used as fool

As alleged in the superseding indictment, among the means and methods by which Keith Raniere and Clare Bronfman participated in illegal conduct was by “using harassment, coercion and abusive litigation to intimidate and attack perceived enemies and critics” of Raniere.  

Bronfman and Raniere made efforts to silence and intimidate DOS “slaves,” soon after public disclosure of DOS by Frank Report. They used several Mexican lawyers to send emails and letters to DOS slaves.

Among the lawyers Nxivm alleges they should have attorney-client privilege with is a one Carmen Gutierrez.

I have some serious doubts that Carmen Gutierrez exists.

On Dec. 7, 2018, an attorneys list provided by Nxivm to the government lists “Carmen Gutierrez” as one of their lawyers but there is no contact information, email address, or associated law firm.

He was listed as an attorney in connection with the NXIVM v. Rick Ross matter.

That seems improbable. Neither Bronfman nor Raniere previously listed Gutierrez as an attorney who represented Nxivm. In response to a request by the government, Nxivm attorney Michael Sullivan indicated he would  provide information regarding the identity of Gutierrez. To date, he has not done so. Does “Carmen Gutierrez” exist?

But regardless of which Mexican attorney they use, it seems that Raniere called all the shots. He even wrote their letters for them.

Let’s look at a time line, most of which comes from the government’s memorandum of law.:

Sept. 6, 2017

Raniere and Bronfman learned that The New York Times would be publishing an article about DOS, based in part on interviews with former Nxivm members.

Sept. 13, 2017

Raniere sent Bronfman an email with the subject line, “What are your thoughts?”:

He then composed the following letter.

“Ms. [Jane Doe 9], I am the chief attorney of a criminal investigation in Mexico of more than 20 individuals tied together in a cooperative destructive network. These individuals, including yourself, have been acting against individuals who participate in the NXIVM corporation community. You are currently connected to the criminal investigations involving fraud, coercion, extortion, harassment, stalking, theft of trade secrets (which includes use of trade secrets compromised of, amongst other things, client lists), criminal conspiracy, computer crimes and corporate espionage. I strongly suggest that you cease and desist, undo, reverse, cancel, and retract, participation in all past, present, and future, conversations, conference calls, meetings, news media, social media, blogs, or websites, relating to this subject matter until the criminal matters are resolved. You should do everything in your power to affect this. Your best course of action to minimize your exposure, in addition to the above, is to repair all damages to parties you have acted against, reconciling with them, and fully cooperating with the criminal investigations. In this regard, I can help you for I represent some of your victims and have access to others. 10 Jane Doe 9 is not referenced in the superseding indictment.

“I know that people in the media (and also bloggers and the like) can be coercive, abusive in their power, and force unwitting, uninformed, participants to complicate situations and potentially even waive rights. You still have the ability to pull away from all participation with these people. Please contact me as soon as possible. “

Less than thirty minutes later, Bronfman sent the text of the email to Alejandro Betancourt in Mexico.

Sept. 14, 2017

Jane Doe 9 received an email from a Mexican lawyer, Mr. Olmedo Gaxiola, with the subject line “CAUSA PENAL EN MEXICO.” Attached to the email was a Microsoft Word document containing, word-for-word, the text of the email sent by Raniere to Bronfman.

The metadata of the Word document received by Jane Doe 9 reflects that the creator of the document was Bronfman.

Sept. 18, 2017

Raniere sent Bronfman another email with the subject line “Draft”.

In it he writes,

“Ms. [Jane Doe 9], You are the only person receiving this letter. This overture is against my better judgement as I feel there is little probability of success yet more expense, but I am writing you on my clients’ behalf.

“If you do not respond affirmatively to this letter by 1:00 pm September 19th I will need to proceed as previously required. I will then not contact you informally again. My clients want to give you this opportunity to cooperate and minimize the impact on your life. The criminal investigations will increase in number, and thoroughness, and will not stop until justice is served. This will not go away.

“The group with which you are involved contains individuals who have already served prison time [Joe O’Hara], others who are currently indicted [Frank Parlato], and some that face extradition proceedings [Catherine Oxenberg, Toni Natalie]. The others are under investigation for quite serious crimes. The form of justice to which they subscribe is trial and conviction by media, personal opinion, and abuse of power. They appear to have no issue with committing a crime when it suites [sic] them. They use the actions of others to justify this. Whether the person they target is right or wrong, this method of persecution is very wrongful. You must separate from them completely to mitigate the effects on yourself. Please divest yourself from this wrongfulness and this group. Please write to me affirmatively by the above deadline indicating you will cooperate fully. I can also help you with any criminal investigations within the United States. Sincerely.

That same day, Jane Doe 9 received an email from Mr. Olmedo Gaxiola attaching a second letter as a document in Microsoft Word.

The letter contained nearly exactly the same text as that sent to Bronfman by Raniere, and, the metadata of the Word document reflects that the creator of the document was Bronfman.

Jane Doe 8 and other DOS “slaves” received similar communications and letters from another Mexican attorney – Ruiz Durán.

Oct. 11, 2017

Six days before The New York Times published its report on DOS, Jane Doe 8 received an email from  Durán. In the email,  Durán stated that he was taking “the liberty to writing to you to let you know that the State’s Attorney’s Office in Mexico, has issued some directives against you and other individuals.”

Durán enclosed a letter in Spanish and a document containing an English translation directing Jane Doe 8 to “[s]top, abstain and refrain from incurring in any type of intimidation, acts of nuisance or disturbances against” Betancourt, legal representative of Nxivm Mexico, “and/or any person with any sort of relation to the Company referred herein.”

On Sept. 14, 2017 and again on Oct. 12, 2017, Bronfman sent Raniere emails attaching a spreadsheet titled “Individuals Involved” listing individuals and the purported “damage” they caused to Raniere and Raniere-created entities. One column in the spreadsheet is titled “Crime,” under which Bronfman documented the supposed crimes each individual committed against Raniere, and another column in the spreadsheet is titled “Priority Level,” with numbers listed beneath.

The names of former DOS “slaves” appear on the list.

Next to Jane Doe 8 and Jane Doe 9’s name, under “Crime,” was listed, “Use of Trade secrets” and “secret disclosure.”  The “Priority Level” indicated for Jane Doe 9 was 1.

It is interesting that

  1. Bronfman and Ranere targeted DOS victims as “individuals involved” in causing “damage” to Raniere.
  2. Bronfman and Raniere—not their attorneys—drafted the letters used to intimidate their enemies.
  3. Bronfman and Raniere used attorneys licensed to practice only in Mexico to send the letters, even though Bronfman, Raniere, Jane Does 8 and 9 all lived in the New York area.
  4. The language of the letters suggest the threat of criminal prosecution.

When communications with attorneys are made for no other purpose than to contact crime victims in an effort to keep them from publicly disclosing the existence of DOS and from reporting their experiences to law enforcement, there can be no attorney-client privilege – at least that is the argument the government makes.

I suspect that argument will prevail.

About the author

Frank Parlato

21 Comments

Click here to post a comment

Leave a Reply to TK Cancel reply

  • Betancourt used as fool

    Betancourt might be a useful idiot but he still allowed himself to be used in an effort to intimidate witnesses.
    The gay Mexican Mussolini must go down.

  • Raniere is so smart, I always thought the phrase was, “Where is the world is Carmen San Diego,” not Gutierrez. I wish I was a smart as Raniere. Someone (prison guard?) also needs to tell Raniere that he should put an “Esq.” behind his name, as many lawyers do. There is no law against that, but there are laws against impersonating a court officer, although a lot of lawyers impersonate that they are human beings, so I guess we’re even.

  • Like everyone else in NXIVM, his greed got the better of him, but his greed appears to be beyond that. A currency exchange business is a great way to launder money. I’m surprised he hasn’t disappeared or turned up dead.

  • Clear obstruction of justice. Plus if Defense Atty knew Carmen Gutierrez doesn’t exist, that is participation in a crime – obstruction of justice and conspiracy.

    There are not many female attorneys in Mexico. Would be easy to find Carmen Gutierrez if she does exist.

    • Carmen Gutierrez is criminal attorney from Anchorage, Ak, who lived in Mexico for awhile. She did work for NXVIM in 00’s. She was high up in Dept of Corrections in Alaska. Friends with Wende Irick, coach.

  • Hey Frank,

    You have made numerous posts claiming that Emi and Betancourt are butt buddies who bend each other over and pound each other’s buttholes.

    I would like you to cite your proof. I don’t believe this necessarily.

    Also, who is the girl and who is the boy in that relationship?

    Who is ‘pitching’ and who is ‘catching’ when they fuck? Who’s butt gets invaded?

    I want facts, not speculation. How sure are you, Frank?

  • https://www.instagram.com/p/BsGh7WRBuXJ/

    “Happy New Year, all! I hope 2019 brings closeness, love, success, challenge and ease. I always felt like a shitty person for severing toxic relationships in my life. At 36, I (finally) do not. Baby steps. Ha. So, the first thing up this year is the Canadian premiere of season 2 of Burden of Truth. And these lovely pics of a (very super extra) glam me! I don’t do many fashion shoots these days, so they feel extra fancy. Thanks to @beyondfashionmagazine for thinking of me and our show😘; I will never be this 😎 in reality. (please note that when reading the article, the word “exotic” should be in quotes–in 1999, this was considered an acceptable way to describe a non-white person)”

    You’re still too much of a coward to talk about NXIVM. What toxic relationships did you sever Kristin? You did not leave NXIVM in 2013. You knew years ago that Keith Raniere was a pedophile and rapist. You did not care. That makes you a very, extremely shitty person. You recruited Allison Mack into the cult and did and said absolutely nothing when the branding story broke. You were happy to use your d-list fame to help build up the cult but refused to use it to draw attention to the crimes. Instead, you portrayed yourself as the savior of teen girls and a girl born to pedophile rape on a tax payer funded television show. That makes you a shitty person. You have attached yourself to a documentary about a rape victim while ignoring NXIVM. That makes you a shitty person. You signed an open letter against a man accused of bad behavior against women while ignoring NXIVM as if you are morally better than him. That makes you a shitty person. Frank Parlato was the only media person calling you out and you continued and still continue to be a coward. You took zero opportunity to do the right thing as long as your fame and money privileges were protected. That makes you a shitty person. Now you are saying you don’t even care. That makes you an extremely shitty person. You are not a victim of NXIVM. You were a willing perpetrator and enabler. You were a big part of it. You don’t get to call anyone toxic when you are a shitty person yourself. If you consider them toxic to you, then you were toxic to them and others. You are no different from them.

    If you had spoken out against NXIVM, perhaps DOS would never existed. Perhaps all those women would not be branded above their pussies with the initials of a bitch you recruited and a pedophile you followed. And you don’t care?

    Also, it is still acceptable to call a foreigner “exotic”. You call us “bigot”, “Nazi” “racist” “privileged” simply for existing and not being PC. You receive huge amounts of predominately white tax dollars to insult said white tax payers. We can call you whatever we like. Stop being PC.

    And to Rose Bhura who left this message: “Go get it my friend!! Plus good riddance to the 💩💩💩 and onwards in 💕🌟🎉❤️” – you are a shitty person too. Not even a single acknowledgement of NXIVM and the fact Kreuk recruited you. You don’t get to say good riddance.

  • Of course Raniere composed the threatening letters. His last, rather eccentric, bail application was obviously mostly composed by him. He likes to be in control, even if his words make him look ridiculous and his attorneys advise him of this. Vanguard is a narcissist and he won’t be able to resist taking the stand, no matter what Agnifilo advises.

    • Totally agree, Pyriel. As this case stretches on, I wouldn’t be surprised to see more bail applications by Raniere.

  • While this question is unrelated to the current post, I’m curious to understand more about the relationship between NXIVM and Roger Stone. It has been stated in the media that he was hired to audit one of their courses or learning modules. However, on face value, this seems like a most interesting, and yet peculiar match. Why would a self-help organization that teaches ethics and humanistic therapy think Roger Stone could help them considering Stone is such a controversial conservative figure in politics? Why would Roger Stone then walk away from and state that he thought they would be better served by an attorney? It’s also known that Roger has a pension for promiscuity — could this have been the initial reason why NXIVM reached out to him for his services? Thanks in advance for further insight.

  • Raniere is very stupid. Hopefully he’s being used as a sex toy for some well endowed convicts in the prison. Or at least getting beaten up regularly.

  • Does anyone know if Keith Raniere performed hypnosis on members? I can’t recall.
    Thanks.

    There should probably be a NXIVM wiki Glossary and index with the cast of characters and madeup vernacular.

  • Hi Frank,

    What are your thoughts on the podcast Escaping NXIVM? Is it balanced? Is it too fair? What is your opinion of the female reporter/researcher who stated she was not sold on NXIVM as a cult? She also said most of the women who took part found it a positive experience. What’s your opinion?

    My personal feeling is that the “social group contagion” effect has occurred with the women who had a positive experience.
    The reporter/researcher in my opinion is out of her mind. She said she didn’t like the “cult term” as well and is used loosely.

    Thanks

  • Meant she said the term cult is used too loosely.
    She seems like a libtard. I am moderate but my self but sometimes people are too far too left.

  • Gotta hand it to Frank for being exactly who he is and doggedly pursuing the truth like this even when it favors those like Betancourt who tried mightily to thwart him.

  • Hmmmm What a coincidence. How about “Carmen. Alaska” instead of Carmen San Diego. There is a Carmen Gutierrez who is an attorney from Anchorage, who also lived for many years in southern Baja, near Cabo. She happens to be close friends with Wende Irick (has been for decades). Wende was a long time employee and associate of NXIVM–she travelled between New York and her hair salon in Anchorage for years and her former husband also worked for NXIVM. Carmen is notable for — her use of abusive tactics. including litigation, to quiet people who know about her past and are her perceived enemies; her fawning s MO; her problem with the truth. Maybe this is your Carmen G??

%d bloggers like this: