Senate Ethics Committee Gives Sen. Cory Booker a Pass

By Tom Fitton

Surprise, surprise. The U.S. Senate is protecting one of its most brazenly unethical members.

We announced this week that the U.S. Senate Select Committee on Ethics has refused to take action against Sen. Cory Booker (D-NJ), who admitted to willfully violating Senate rules by releasing confidential records regarding then-Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh’s time as a White House counsel. The documents were marked “Committee confidential,” meaning they were not for public distribution.

Our September 2018 complaint to the chairman and co-chairman of the U.S. Senate Select Committee on Ethics called for an investigation after Sen. Booker admitted to violating Senate rules in releasing the confidential material. Ethics Committee Chief Counsel and Staff Director Deborah Sue Mayer responded last week:

The Select Committee on Ethics (the Committee) has reviewed the complaint you filed against Senator Cory A. Booker, dated September 12, 2018. The Committee carefully evaluated the allegations in the complaint and, based on all the information before it, determined that no further action is appropriate. Thank you for your correspondence with the Committee.
Sen. Booker admitted breaking Senate rules when he issued a tweet on Friday, September 7 saying:
Weds—I broke committee rules by reading from “Committee confidential” docs.
Also, Sen. Booker then posted the following entry on his Facebook account on Sunday, September 9:
And the classification of many documents as “Committee confidential” is a sham… I willfully violate these sham rules. I fully accept any consequences that might arise from my actions including expulsion.

We noted in our complaint that Sen. Booker also uploaded “Committee confidential” records to a publicly accessible Dropbox account with the heading “Booker Confidential  – Kavanaugh Hearing Documents”.

By violating the rules in releasing Committee confidential records, Sen. Booker appeared to have violated provisions 5 and/or 6 of Rule 29 of the Standing Rules of the Senate (Rev. Jan. 24, 2013), which stipulate that he should be subject to expulsion from the Senate:

5. Any Senator, officer or employee of the Senate who shall disclose the secret or confidential business or proceedings of the Senate, including the business and proceedings of the committees, subcommittees and offices of the Senate shall be liable, if a Senator, to suffer expulsion from the body; and if an officer or employee, to dismissal from the service of the Senate, and to punishment for contempt.

6. Whenever, by the request of the Senate or any committee thereof, any documents or papers shall be communicated to the Senate by the President or the head of any department relating to any matter pending in the Senate, the proceedings in regard to which are secret or confidential under the rules, said documents and papers shall be considered as confidential, and shall not be disclosed without leave of the Senate.

The Senate Ethics Committee is evenly split, with three Republicans and three Democrats. The Committee members are Johnny Isakson (R-GA), Christopher A. Coons (D-DE), Pat Roberts (R-KS), Brian Schatz (D-HI), James Risch (R-ID), and Jeanne Shaheen (D-NH).

It is an absolute disgrace that the Senate Ethics Committee is giving Senator Booker a pass for willfully violating Senate rules by leaking confidential information to smear Justice Kavanaugh. The Senate continues the abuse of Kavanaugh and his family by refusing to act against a Senator who, pretending to be Spartacus, violated the rule of law and our Constitution in trying to destroy him.

About the author


News and art, national and local. Began as alternative weekly in 1990 in Buffalo, NY. Publishing content online since 1996.


Click here to post a comment
  • Tom, Keep up the great work, our Republic needs more dedicated citizens like you ! I do have a question of our Muslim Congressman that I can’t seem to get answered. Maybe you can get it answered. The foundation of our Republic is the separation of Church and State. The foundation of Islam is the unification of Church and State. The State runs, all aspects of a Muslims life, not just the Church!!! The Koran ( I’ve read it) demands death to those who disagree, they are called “infidels”. Muslims who drift away from the Koran are called Kafurs, the worst type of infidels.
    So please ask Booker and Ellison and the new Muslims to explain how they can believe in and swear to defend the Constitution (separation of Church and State) and the Koran ( Church and State are ONE) ?! Do they not have the Koran as their Book of Faith, that some use to take their oath of Office, as freaking unbelievable as that is? OR do they not believe in ALL the Shuras in the Koran. My copy was written by Abdul Joseph and is highly recognized by many Imams as the best. Also why don’t the Republicans file suit against all Muslims who believe in the teachings of the Koran, Church and State is Allah, they lied when they took their Oath of Office!!!?

    • P. S. If Judicial Watch would file against Booker, for a start, I would be happy to be the lead Plaintiff .

%d bloggers like this: