Indictment Day is the day AG Barr announces that numerous former and possibly a few, current Government officials, were Indicted for very serious Felonies. In my opinion, it will involve Hillary “Rotten” Clinton being indicted for Espionage, Money Laundering, Mail Fraud, Wire fraud and numerous other charges along with members of her staff; Huma Abedin, Jake Sullivan, Cheryl Mills and Podesta, Also indicted will be James Comey, Andy McCabe, Peter Strzok, Lisa Page and possibly, FBI Attorney James Baker.
Rounding out the rest of the Racketeering Organization are those who Conspired to commit RICO Predicate Crimes to adversely affect the chances of Candidate Trump from being elected and then Conspired to interfere in his ability to fulfill his responsibilities as the duly elected President. They are Loretta Lynch, John Brennan, James Clapper, Susan Powers, Rod Rosenstein, Sally Yates, Susan Rice, Bruce Ohr, Nellie Ohr, Christopher Steele, Glenn Simpson, Bryan Pagliano, Paul Combetta and several others. I am not saying all these players committed all these crimes. I am saying there is Probable cause to satisfy all the elements of the RICO Statute to believe that everyone named above, violated Crime(s) that should be prosecuted as a part of a RICO Case.
These trusted Government employees and private contractors all participated, in my opinion, in a plan, scheme, organized effort to violate numerous Federal Laws including Fraud Against the FISA court, Hobbs Act-Wire and Mail Fraud, Leaking confidential information, Destruction of Government Property, Obstruction Of Justice (interfering in the Clinton email Case), Intentional Violation of Evidence Chain of Custody Rules, Altering Evidence, Dealing with Unregistered, Foreign Agents To Interfere in A Presidential Election, Lying Under Oath, Civil Rights Violations by Abuse of the FISA Court, and Illegal Unmasking of US Citizens monitored by a FISA wiretap and many crimes considered Predicate Crimes in violation of the RICO Statute (Racketeering violation).
These trusted people acted individually and/or as a part of a group, a group that can be defined, by law, as a Racketeering Organization.
From the Department of Justice, Justice Manual;
“It is unlawful for anyone employed by or associated with any enterprise engaged in, or the activities of which affect, interstate or foreign commerce, to conduct or participate, directly or indirectly, in the conduct of such enterprise’s affairs through a pattern of racketeering activity or collection of unlawful debt. 18 U.S.C.A. § 1962(c)”
Further; “A more expansive view holds that in order to be found guilty of violating the RICO statute, the government must prove beyond a reasonable doubt: (1) that an enterprise existed; (2) that the enterprise affected interstate commerce; (3) that the defendant was associated with or employed by the enterprise; (4) that the defendant engaged in a pattern of racketeering activity; and (5) that the defendant conducted or participated in the conduct of the enterprise through that pattern of racketeering activity through the commission of at least two acts of racketeering activity as set forth in the indictment.” ( there are 35 Predicate Crimes such as Money laundering, Mail Fraud, Wire Fraud).
“An enterprise is defined as including any individual, partnership, corporation, association, or other legal entity, and any union or group of individuals associated in fact although not a legal entity. 18 U.S.C.A. § 1961(4)”.
“Pattern of racketeering activity” requires at least two acts of racketeering activity committed within ten years of each other. 18 U.S.C.A. § 1961(5) . The government must show that the racketeering predicates are related, and that they amount to or pose a threat of continued criminal activity.Id. Racketeering predicates are related if they have the same or similar purposes, results, participants, victims, or methods of commission, or otherwise are interrelated by distinguishing characteristics and are not isolated events…” “Furthermore, the degree in which these factors establish a pattern may depend on the degree of proximity, or any similarities in goals or methodology, or the number of repetitions”.
As to the continuity requirement, “the government may show that the racketeering acts found to have been committed pose a threat of continued racketeering activity by proving: (1) that the acts are part of a long-term association that exists for criminal purposes, or (2) that they are a regular way of conducting the defendant’s ongoing legitimate business, or (3) that they are a regular way of conducting or participating in an ongoing and legitimate enterprise”… “When a RICO action is brought before continuity can be established, then liability depends on whether the threat of continuity is demonstrated.”
“The RICO statute expressly states that it is unlawful for any person to conspire to violate any of the subsections of 18 U.S.C.A. § 1962. The government need not prove that the defendant agreed with every other conspirator, knew all of the other conspirators, or had full knowledge of all the details of the conspiracy.” “All that must be shown is: (1) that the defendant agreed to commit the substantive racketeering offense through agreeing to participate in two racketeering acts; (2) that he knew the general status of the conspiracy; and (3) that he knew the conspiracy extended beyond his individual role.”
Now, if we were to make the Democrat National Committee, the one Hillary bought and channeled money into from the Clinton Foundation, the Criminal Enterprise, then read the exurbs from the DOJ Justice Manual again and see how things just fall into place!