Featured News

Independent Democratic Conference to Reunify with Democratic Conference Conference — Ending Longstanding Discord

NYS Legislative Session Update
From Jack O’Donnell

Fractured state Senate Democrats on Wednesday ended their longstanding hostilities by reunifying ahead of a high-stakes election season.

Eight Senate Democrats who have been aligned with the GOP since 2011 agreed to dissolve the Independent Democratic Conference and return to the mainline Democrats.

Under the agreement, which was hashed out during a two-hour meeting on Tuesday with Gov. Cuomo, Rep. Joseph Crowley (D-Queens) and influential labor unions, Independent Democratic Conference Leader Jeffrey Klein (D-Bronx) will no longer be co-leader of the chamber.

Instead, he will become Senate Democratic Minority Leader Andrea Stewart-Cousins’ top deputy, replacing Sen. Michael Gianaris, the Queens Dem who also heads the Democratic Senate Campaign Committee. Gianaris is expected to keep that role.

Ultimately, the level of impact the reunification will have on the dynamics of the Senate remains to be seen: In order to have the 32 Democrats needed for a majority, the party has to win two special Senate elections on April 24 and a Democrat that currently conferences with the Republicans, Sen. Simcha Felder of Brooklyn, would have to agree to return to the fold.  Further, legislative rules will make it very difficult for a change in majority before the end of session this year.
Move coverage:
IDC Lawmakers Lose Committee Posts
New York’s Democrats Ended a 7-Year Civil War. Now Comes the Hard Part.
Sealing the Deal on Senate Reunification
With Senate Democratic Unity Deal, Klein Ready to Give Up Albany Power Post
Senate Democrats Unite At Cuomo’s Prodding

New Committee Chairs Named in the Senate

As a result of the IDC-Dem merger, former IDC members have been stripped of their committee chairmanships and replaced by members of the Republican Majority.

  • Fred Akshar of Binghamton will chair of the Labor Committee in place of Marisol Alcantara of Manhattan;
  • Chris Jacobs of Erie County will replace David Carlucci of Rockland County on the Consumer Protection Committee;
  • Elaine Phillips of Nassau County takes over the Banks Committee from Jesse Hamiltonof Brooklyn;
  • Pam Helming of Canandaigua will supplant Tony Avella of Queens on Children and Families.

From the Albany Times Union: Common Sense Elevator Safety Regulations Long Overdue

The tragic death earlier this year of a construction worker who fell down an elevator shaft in New York City’s Gramercy Park neighborhood is the nightmare scenario of every family with a loved one in the construction industry. When tragedies like this turn out to be preventable, it makes it that much more painful. And yet that’s the reality in New York, one of the last remaining states that has no education or training requirements for elevator mechanics.

That’s right — the state with the most elevators in the nation has no standard training requirements for the men and women who service those elevators. Let that sink in next time you step into a balky elevator.

The Elevator Safety Act would transform elevator safety in New York by setting minimum education and training standards for elevator mechanics. The legislation would also create an Elevator Contractors License and an Elevator Safety and Standards Board.

As technology advances, standards become even more important. Education and training are critical to understanding the complexity of the ever-changing technology of installing, maintaining and modernizing elevators. This highly technical equipment requires precise installation and maintenance to ensure maximum safety.

Where New York has stalled, other states have acted. Licensing for elevator contractors is standard in more than 30 states and Washington, D.C. Most states have found such legislation to be either revenue neutral or a source of revenue. States that have implemented similar legislation show a 26 percent decrease in accidents and injuries, while some states have shown a higher than 50 percent decrease in accidents and injuries.

In Albany, this legislation has broad, bipartisan support in the Legislature and Gov. Andrew Cuomo has promised to sign it once it’s passed. And yet each year for the past five years, as the legislative session winds down, the bill dies a quiet death.

So how does a common sense, revenue-neutral bill supported by the governor and large majorities in both the Assembly and Senate fail to become law for five straight years?

Because big-money special interests like the Real Estate Board of New York (REBNY) and the Rent Stabilization Association (RSA) quietly meet with their beneficiaries in some backroom of the state Senate, and elevator safety is swept aside.

That’s how things work on Planet Albany. Commonsense laws that would prevent horrific tragedies don’t pass if they don’t have the support of the industry groups with deep pockets.

Hopefully 2018 is the year that all changes.

Once again, the Elevator Safety Act has broad, bipartisan support. Once again, we’ll work to line up sponsors who will stand up and lay out an argument that no one will disagree with in the light of day. Once again, we will point to the tragic deaths — 12 now in the past two years — of people who have died in New York state as a result of an elevator accident.

The question is whether, once again, this legislation dies in the Senate’s back room, or lawmakers finally bring the Elevator Safety Act to a vote.

     Worth a Read
Upcoming Events & Deadlines
  • April 9th—United Mine Workers Local 717 hold press conference to endorse Claudia Tenney for Congress
  • April 10th—TU Capitol Confidential Event – What We Saw at the Percoco Trial
  • April 10th—MOA Sandy Galef hosts election law forum
  • April 10th & 15th—37th Senate District Forum: Julie Killian and Shelly Mayer
  • April 24th—Special Election – Assembly 5, 10, 17, 39, 74, 80, 102, 107, 142 / Senate 32, 37
Upcoming Receptions
  • Reception honoring MOA Diana Richardson (D)April 10th @ 6:00 PM-Manhattan
  • Reception honoring MOA Erik Dilan (D)April 12th @ 6:00 PM-Brooklyn
  • Reception honoring Senator Terrence Murphy (R)April 12th @ 6:00 PM-Mount Kisco
  • Reception honoring Senate Candidate Luis Sepulveda (D)April 13th @ 7:00 PM-Bronx

Featured Read: From ‘The Sky is Falling!’ to ‘No Worries’: How a State Deficit Goes Away

When officials in late fall started to put all the pieces of a new state budget together for Gov. Andrew M. Cuomo to present in January, the gloomy talk started coming out of the Capitol’s first floor where his budget staff is based.

The state, officials warned, faced a looming $4.4 billion deficit. Put in perspective, that’s almost what is spent each year on New York’s sprawling judiciary and prisons systems.

In the final budget enacted March 31, officials say the deficit was completely wiped out.

How did they do it?

Holding the line on certain spending? Hauling in new revenues? Some fiscal maneuvering?

Yes, yes and yes.

Here is the gist of how the deficit was closed. Keep in mind, though, that there is not any single source in the thousands of pages of the 11 different budget bills that might help explain how it happened. Also, the actual reporting by the state of the precise fiscal numbers won’t be made public until sometime in May when Cuomo’s office releases a document known as the adopted budget financial plan.

The Buffalo News turned to three sources: the Cuomo administration; a state lawmaker involved in the negotiations; and an outside fiscal watchdog of state finances. Taken as a whole, their explanations show how the deficit was erased.

Sen. Catharine Young, an Olean Republican who heads the Senate Finance Committee, said the “real” deficit was $1.7 billion, not the $4.4 billion figure Cuomo used. That’s because the higher amount reflected the red ink that the state was facing if spending and revenue actions already on the books were permitted to continue in the 2018 fiscal year. But, Young said, all sides have agreed for years to a self-imposed annual growth of 2 percent of the budget’s general fund. That, she said, meant the deficit was actually $1.7 billion.

Cuomo’s budget plan in January was balanced, by law, but she said he did it with more than $1 billion in tax and fee hikes, among other revenue raisers.

“Our conference said absolutely no to more taxes and fees,” she said of the Senate GOP.

When it became clear that some Cuomo tax hikes were going to be rejected and both legislative houses wanted to drive more money than Cuomo’s plan to public schools, a solution was found: re-estimating revenues. In other words, they took another look at the books and decided they were being too conservative in what Albany would raise in tax revenues. After all, 2017 was a boom year on Wall Street and tax receipts were showing that.

The result: A “revenue forecasting consensus” was reached and they agreed $750 million in higher-than-expected taxes would flow to the state’s coffers.

There were more re-estimates, this time on the spending side. Negotiators agreed that spending in the recently concluded fiscal year would be $250 million less than expected and, importantly, that the trend would continue by the same level in the new fiscal year that began April 1.

So, between those two re-estimate exercises, about $1 billion was trimmed from the deficit, taking it down to about $700 million.

Assistance came from other areas. Notably: $750 million in the current fiscal year will go to the state – $500 million to its general fund account – as part of a multi-year, special levy Albany is imposing on the sale of the non-profit Fidelis Catholic health insurance program to Centene, a for-profit carrier.

That lowered the deficit total to $200 million. A combination of a new surcharge on opioid manufacturers and distributors – about $100 million – and miscellaneous agency, program savings and rounding got it the rest of the way to zero.

Administration officials said the true deficit number at the start of the process was $4.4 billion and that keeping state spending to the 2 percent cap level – which got things down to a $1.7 billion deficit – took a combination of spending cuts and proposed tax increases. State agency spending, for instance, was held basically flat for another year, despite growth in staff salaries and other costs.

“We closed the $4.4 billion deficit by achieving many of the savings proposals put forth in the Executive Budget, such as actions to hold state agency spending flat, containing Medicaid growth within the global cap and service consolidation and reorganizations,’’ said Morris Peters, a spokesman for Cuomo’s budget division.

During negotiations, two basic things happened to affect the financial plan Cuomo sought: the Senate rejected most of the tax hikes he proposed – such as closing a loophole on third party internet sales on sites such as Amazon – and lawmakers nearly doubled what the school aid increase that Cuomo planned in January. The net-negative effect: about $1 billion. To counter, the spending and revenue re-estimates. The net-positive effect of those: about $1 billion.

David Friedfel, director of state studies at the Citizens Budget Commission, a private group that monitors state financial matters, noted the see-saw effect on the deficit number as various spending and revenue-raising actions took place during budget talks.

The deficit was reduced, he noted, also by the state banking on $577 million in legal monetary settlements with companies on various matters. Some of that went to the general fund, some went to New York City to help with its declining subway system.

While Senate Republicans take credit for beating back Cuomo tax hikes, Friedfel said nearly $621 million is coming from new revenue actions, including the opioid surcharge and the Fidelis insurance levy.

Friedfel said the $750 million in revenue re-estimates is what ended up bankrolling for lawmakers an extra $200 million in school aid and the Senate’s ability to kill off some tax hikes.

But Friedfel says state officials, once again, moved some cost items to other accounts to show spending being kept at the self-imposed 2 percent cap. Instead, he said such cost-shifting and other steps helped to mask what he believes is a spending hike that is actually double the inflation rate.

Worrisome, too, is the use of one-shot kind of revenue actions, such as the $577 in monetary legal settlements. “They used a number of one-time revenue action to really get through this year,’’ he said.

Friedfel said such fiscal maneuvers might be explained if the state’s economy was tanking and officials were desperate to find funds to pay for critical spending needs.

“But they’re doing it now at a time when the economy is growing. What steps do we take when the economy is contracting?’’ he said.

ABOUT OUR TEAM

Smart Strategy Begins with Being Well Informed.

We are a premier government relations and public affairs consulting firm dedicated to providing strategic advice, counsel, and value-added services in order to deliver solid and smart messages to key decision-makers in both the public and private sectors.

Once again, thank you for your interest in our firm. Please email us with any suggestions or ideas.

Jack O’Donnell, Partner
Buffalo | Albany | New York City


About the author

Artvoice

Artvoice

News and art, national and local. Began as alternative weekly in 1990 in Buffalo, NY. Publishing content online since 1996.

Add Comment

Click here to post a comment

Leave a Reply

%d bloggers like this: